From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAAD8207A3F; Thu, 12 Dec 2024 07:07:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733987261; cv=none; b=aOICERoxVvhXyOy9dCz/5uMvGtftTvKNiKS1mKplvCzJCjpmOBRd2vBD0DkIAasMg4dnWk+fMg5Oz0KOBpLYTcCpwuBv5TV02+hYpeLOL6FhsI5ZpP0qs7qJkErHNuV+T9TDqQlK/NmqmvoCOT4IQtpW4Y9KG8Khg49AL8kdeNs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733987261; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BPlTTDNDzZrp2N3by7TZVYWXY230hjPm+o9JsvANubQ=; h=From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Message-Id:Date: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=iGEEl4IfkSE3rlOVFxmQCjPco2SZYRUuQfBmK9AkjXfyT+JLFbFqgfSzzuwt/LjZuY+OCdzZlqhsWtWh2E/rjTdaIFnfTutSjTqKdks3KSDG0KRrfynM4OGQt8kYYWEGYckzv6F82TT+znVhqXrZk/RU7LTZVd7b+bSrN/XvaqQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=PZs5ksbe; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="PZs5ksbe" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CDF1DC4CECE; Thu, 12 Dec 2024 07:07:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1733987260; bh=BPlTTDNDzZrp2N3by7TZVYWXY230hjPm+o9JsvANubQ=; h=From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date:From; b=PZs5ksbeH5KXdOE1XARgM6Gy1gtWiwPlj7cOlo7L0hfjXd4ha7b507N+ENCRvT6GW hHYy/TgKP1cmHNBqukeWWCMLsQEjQr93zhTFKeMsCXkCNZO3l5qW/ANf6P7mBFd4Cs moXR/T8OdAjN71T8n2kSQ2C7PTwIZ6HRQUPnUUF3+ix+imhcxTp/pKNSQXbTWiGf8a bGYqgo6xNIhqIxPhUnSlT1BO1VZGPbVU6mdnYE8uJG/zcbXRcvfAUfz2rAwjdxQt0c sc4CWQcPcKFsfzWKfjq2UCXsENI2EjAD05GO+7xGTz0e0HFO53QeWx9bLywnSgOBpt H9yUh+liNr37w== From: Namhyung Kim To: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Adrian Hunter , Kan Liang , James Clark , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, akanksha@linux.ibm.com, maddy@linux.ibm.com, atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, kjain@linux.ibm.com, disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com, hbathini@linux.ibm.com, Ian Rogers In-Reply-To: <20241205022305.158202-1-irogers@google.com> References: <20241205022305.158202-1-irogers@google.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf test expr: Fix system_tsc_freq for only x86 Message-Id: <173398725978.3728083.17030127353710822170.b4-ty@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 23:07:39 -0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.15-dev-c04d2 On Wed, 04 Dec 2024 18:23:05 -0800, Ian Rogers wrote: > The refactoring of tool PMU events to have a PMU then adding the expr > literals to the tool PMU made it so that the literal system_tsc_freq > was only supported on x86. Update the test expectations to match - > namely the parsing is x86 specific and only yields a non-zero value on > Intel. > > > [...] Applied to perf-tools, thanks! Best regards, Namhyung