From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2C40210F6D; Fri, 10 Jan 2025 16:49:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736527792; cv=none; b=p/w/YJIC+TBRU+/Qe5u+GNeshQbpkHP8G6koaYZxthT92FgpF1TtD/KOJZ0mvnBhyiAeK2RubwDwAKKklKEPGOo/bbdeDXT5NhhakPRP/LwMwgz1cdciQk2N7JBefqnhTkR2yzkdlND7hfsFnkTTUqL4g+NJj9009QBQmIZVY5E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736527792; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+yDQ+vJqHznaDyos9xjW00xrBMEHb0ruggMNJ4oZado=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FFRITKTtjwuxTUcR0nqJp7VwW4BiHdqhg6L2TDurffso2h5XNhPZ1Au1q7rtnroTidWUpfs+pTiUG3W+odYYn8mEPJ/PPeg3TlcQ8/AKvvUVOuyJkKq1c3IM+eHwEvJbbFDj5XacW2LZG8Lg7dTjDJ1NGwVjXvm8jhp8sXW0BH8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=gLO9DXzI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="gLO9DXzI" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 40CDAC4CED6; Fri, 10 Jan 2025 16:49:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1736527791; bh=+yDQ+vJqHznaDyos9xjW00xrBMEHb0ruggMNJ4oZado=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=gLO9DXzIlngQ9OUW3zqrNtoKR/H74kAqGYSNWAScFW40NQZJn2QqcvV6+MG3gNXgI my5endsWAut9pMhmvwxsvzquT3VC1mKv5BjgbGhotQIzW3OogWmpYsEn3+uqWcd38m 5G0gI2C7eH443UZFOqee6loc3CoWD8/K57KY0OSpObvFjG9HE9v6GQin6VK8AExl88 rHmm3X45mMJjtDM9spQ8s8VL9MGJWWsVLwjqBmk7qHUoyGiFDPYTa+AFZV1/R2TMF4 1IG+OfL3s3hZDWmsgCw1MQ8Rm+HNhXbgkQ6f8B7oaD9tHFy7Qew4SpzdVm0r6qIXbo cD2Vklyl/aqPA== From: Kees Cook To: Nicolas Pitre , Dan Carpenter Cc: Kees Cook , Alexander Viro , Christian Brauner , Jan Kara , Eric Biederman , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] binfmt_flat: Fix integer overflow bug on 32 bit systems Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 08:49:47 -0800 Message-Id: <173652778610.3103415.15796406713093643015.b4-ty@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <5be17f6c-5338-43be-91ef-650153b975cb@stanley.mountain> References: <5be17f6c-5338-43be-91ef-650153b975cb@stanley.mountain> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Wed, 04 Dec 2024 15:07:15 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > Most of these sizes and counts are capped at 256MB so the math doesn't > result in an integer overflow. The "relocs" count needs to be checked > as well. Otherwise on 32bit systems the calculation of "full_data" > could be wrong. > > full_data = data_len + relocs * sizeof(unsigned long); > > [...] Applied to for-next/topic/execve/core, thanks! [1/1] binfmt_flat: Fix integer overflow bug on 32 bit systems https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/55cf2f4b945f Take care, -- Kees Cook