From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45A0A1A2545; Fri, 17 Jan 2025 17:54:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737136490; cv=none; b=KvyDRf2ESI2XedqJ9/mG1rEbRifamSsAubJdutfpQJGPRiN7UdJL9Idqx9fd0otUoMp4ZeZvnjAe2j4ybZIruHcEr5w+qwXPsZGdGWazbeK018i2UOZ/8jBIi90mn9L4/rwnNYV1y7KT7oPp9FdNKnh9di1USpcAlnYLhpOVle0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737136490; c=relaxed/simple; bh=l/6wF/EDMIvsA/eaOJsLjWnKZtD+VU0hJlgH1WsjcsM=; h=From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Message-Id:Date: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=KGwvce66RNkVQ1OxcNilYE+0I7IrLz6y2AHPgv1J/0e+N/i4PYmRic4a82y/e8odeFOXsliep26YX3v00iYjq0LXYk88BngOXtMCaEdVSZIjKrTXtIVGmA0aiuk4egZ0rxF1XmF9LpP153BicpWU14yKFPI0t0iJF9DDex5o/3I= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Qi5EULaT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Qi5EULaT" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 74AB1C4CEE0; Fri, 17 Jan 2025 17:54:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1737136489; bh=l/6wF/EDMIvsA/eaOJsLjWnKZtD+VU0hJlgH1WsjcsM=; h=From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date:From; b=Qi5EULaT8xEatiBtldu/tQTmfjbLEPSMTkWX8mYP8TE8eKOQd1RAX3z4mCyOwG4km zrsoqG/jadKViIJMkREktihor/YYwm/fFvkZC4c3o0aIp0nh60z9g9UXTmydowUL8V Xe5wpbySvRUvXJ5Sa5CK90Jp4Cm4pGMoungbHxRsogmBrKcmxVLmpFpHdHPeXUYqv0 WNp0+9dXxwmim9cp6r6fVRVZM+Jb528BQJVCcP4cVNphY6VTxQkBLC+uXtfEVYfpiC +erNfRjYGEq4foAHfbSruWx7yNbqOjiNY39ejUnrfiNfBJVyFfkqTues8b2XW5NFar GScDoAz0LSZ9g== From: Namhyung Kim To: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Adrian Hunter , Kan Liang , James Clark , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ian Rogers In-Reply-To: <20250110045736.598281-1-irogers@google.com> References: <20250110045736.598281-1-irogers@google.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] perf test: Add a runs-per-test option Message-Id: <173713648943.2190713.18158908440161125480.b4-ty@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 09:54:49 -0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.15-dev-c04d2 On Thu, 09 Jan 2025 20:57:31 -0800, Ian Rogers wrote: > Add a runs-per-test option to perf test inorder to better diagnose > flakes. Each runs executes as if it were a different test, the tests > appear together in the output: > > ``` > $ perf test -r 3 lbr -v > 122: perf record LBR tests : Ok > 122: perf record LBR tests : Ok > 122: perf record LBR tests : Ok > ``` > > [...] Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks! Best regards, Namhyung