From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E5E21E9B2A; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 18:26:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737397613; cv=none; b=P+IYEoATqQG7iAsDakCw2HjCbvJAs3EHuODEft+IeRJTMx/H+jd21qPphqchUeTAoY7i9UaXFhZqWiq3eiAhym6oJ7V8h4IbIxNRn5/R4OjGP9sWH+HhTRe99F8YIEaCKp+er03h1p9EQeajm1sPr7/OSRHjk82HnAm+hpQQYS4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737397613; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Q/fcUq+Z2zKVTrBPFTtMg7IuhExPLXL6+eWlvIZevhU=; h=From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Message-Id:Date: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ox4+5lQbKDZnhCIMRXsSUhiOviIyAfVZTCxBGTxzHEIRxW2nyRN95ayUgFD7JL8mPw68LQHChyWwKP4YipTJ6Yx1L56vG+3npiZdPWa6smuKgbC6AAGUuheh9MPCwxOPDOpR2HLWiQkLMFTVsx2KHYDbbdipAAVhyUNIFH9EKPM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=IyG4m2Uc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="IyG4m2Uc" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 79B9DC4CEDD; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 18:26:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1737397612; bh=Q/fcUq+Z2zKVTrBPFTtMg7IuhExPLXL6+eWlvIZevhU=; h=From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date:From; b=IyG4m2UcOHcTRlA1fo6RHGP595iOJYAa+KL2G8j0N65oI87Vf/bXbUIqfnf54bmal hGvIh65KFHnm+qdk6d8o7ctVxsUNx2ZzzI9pwE0Y8z6RKvzOgNJWx0cshtHDJosrvm tnzwUXvcqCZfO9sb6/HynFB8wzeov4GIvVz3UuNBbH7/4Z6SZKo44KQIXd7WVE4K2/ ygJYltcWmAxlPbK3sKqXm92Wb1iG+pKsOt4aeUBe4XZ+4SP6U+OrdEc7Ws90eS+XbU t1mcP3R9rPzglBIKi2LIzwJaEzmf1nuK6N4pQYLEZY+FudhJdu6zIBzlAd5tmTBe6j epjeu5KZeCW1A== From: Namhyung Kim To: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Adrian Hunter , Kan Liang , Chen Ni , Athira Rajeev , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ian Rogers In-Reply-To: <20250117181848.690474-1-irogers@google.com> References: <20250117181848.690474-1-irogers@google.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] perf annotate: Prefer passing evsel to evsel->core.idx Message-Id: <173739761245.3950752.18015295807257633517.b4-ty@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 10:26:52 -0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.15-dev-c04d2 On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 10:18:48 -0800, Ian Rogers wrote: > An evsel idx may not be stable due to sorting, evlist removal, > etc. Try to reduce it being part of APIs by explicitly passing the > evsel in annotate code. Internally the code just reads evsel->core.idx > so behavior is unchanged. > > Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks! Best regards, Namhyung