From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D685222F17F; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 12:44:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738759475; cv=none; b=nzj0QtMq1K7AGmzkHGt13hlceORD1o9rqw9p/qRyTP07ljswFwPBzrj06rWZ+poV3Eyoh1d9Y/O6cIhlF3G+d/CXF815PU2p5n2nIMXzfHgewGJbM+dFJxZSnZgvgH+XYYZoKNQdXzk/3/uyJBZ8Ub+4e9JZ22jD4qk2TIH353Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738759475; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BKicQvUmuXjDNbRZxUNlJ8r+EcHKaqqCQZUX4SaRzuA=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Message-Id:Date: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=XPrzi2J92PhwEJ8s5UJMJI/6aa7zuYgQcd6rRDsB6s5b3Y7fIbgwdAexAJGQJphCA0uLxZO12bMULNXL/m++hKONuMTfEX3dDdvibDCh84dzGaaw+61IUz/6CYA7mKIkpJqK4hSfE4wCzSDVxIN5dmXjFWsCLdeZcaJBK7qrUo8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=IjYjSZvw; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="IjYjSZvw" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 93B4BC4CEE2; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 12:44:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1738759475; bh=BKicQvUmuXjDNbRZxUNlJ8r+EcHKaqqCQZUX4SaRzuA=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date:From; b=IjYjSZvwELSQpD5fB7WkqjYVoxJq4rM1/k43Ug4L7RVYc8tveaU3L2TBDc/fdHgaI qnUoeGvd/JwyW+FcHFNFKluby6U/yZP2HSsp/sTT96hMRvdEVcnPdQBBGVAWpE7RWl VH3L02IuUR+P6PXu9O60xRnhSBwuurZ1MJKOEeXbHXk1vB0FQ23e498CuVggoISxWc jUhCuNFw4F1zwCEql9Up5sji8o8iG9WdiwnPItFGlMBr3si2cT+1614uklRtIzzfPL jhbLmnMUaiK5lMnKe8Z8wjnaPOjB9cXYXpsCDWrEcLBQQvDrNjyBGFsikae59SB1BS oSdWN6fJ8roBw== From: Mark Brown To: lgirdwood@gmail.com, perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com, linux@treblig.org Cc: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20250201005021.447726-1-linux@treblig.org> References: <20250201005021.447726-1-linux@treblig.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: mediatek: Remove unused mtk_memif_set_rate Message-Id: <173875947335.32457.7286096499117133517.b4-ty@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2025 12:44:33 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.15-dev-1b0d6 On Sat, 01 Feb 2025 00:50:21 +0000, linux@treblig.org wrote: > mtk_memif_set_rate() has been unused since it was added in the 2019 > commit 9cdf85a19b3a ("ASoC: mediatek: common: add some helpers to control > mtk_memif") > > Remove it. > > (The _substream version is used, and is left in) > > [...] Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next Thanks! [1/1] ASoC: mediatek: Remove unused mtk_memif_set_rate commit: c9e9aa80022c6db71bc097a621a6145f39aa0ade All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark