mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, ionela.voinescu@arm.com,
	sudeep.holla@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	sumitg@nvidia.com, ptsm@linux.microsoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: amu: Delay allocating cpumask for AMU FIE support
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 13:59:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <173944478263.2605897.5555784632946781698.b4-ty@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250131155842.3839098-1-beata.michalska@arm.com>

On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 15:58:42 +0000, Beata Michalska wrote:
> For the time being, the amu_fie_cpus cpumask is being exclusively used
> by the AMU-related internals of FIE support and is guaranteed to be
> valid on every access currently made. Still the mask is not being
> invalidated on one of the error handling code paths, which leaves
> a soft spot with theoretical risk of UAF for CPUMASK_OFFSTACK cases.
> To make things sound, delay allocating said cpumask
> (for CPUMASK_OFFSTACK) avoiding otherwise nasty sanitising case failing
> to register the cpufreq policy notifications.
> 
> [...]

Applied to arm64 (for-next/fixes), thanks!

[1/1] arm64: amu: Delay allocating cpumask for AMU FIE support
      https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/d923782b0412

Cheers,
-- 
Will

https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev

      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-13 13:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-31 15:58 Beata Michalska
2025-01-31 16:34 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-02-13 13:59 ` Will Deacon [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=173944478263.2605897.5555784632946781698.b4-ty@kernel.org \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=beata.michalska@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ptsm@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=sumitg@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®