From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F41C5207DF7; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 22:30:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740436203; cv=none; b=n6qabvpmNX2qC3Q/L25sVBu1MOIcDvPC14LIWEZhUrmHlhetWDVCEiHIlqt3XDl0xPtcDU264uAz3X1xjftN2lZZZZ4MYNkMPu9XLrohJkxupeWkrKnxYXQluGKXt/8tZTBDXRW8sHZwp8eKQNU4NK2jgP5+OI0eznpyRp7/spU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740436203; c=relaxed/simple; bh=o3/XUGQL0m+SzquU2ZDcO4lPV6KEAziuUL08AurUYbE=; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:From:Message-Id:Date:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=VnKCSCdyb6CB1ayQ39ah2O/JejO7lOIrchRaeQly2RP50NRjkbH62RLOznKNbNZsNSY1xyYFLkdTafJENLyJIirYJ53w6U8VEiUCri82jIxCBKDVdFB7OB5lIyCmn39xej106uskzsf6Ti4VX0BH1WpKv6ov2nAAr4qdp/3pcdM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=qGn/0Rpa; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="qGn/0Rpa" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7AC08C4AF09; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 22:30:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1740436202; bh=o3/XUGQL0m+SzquU2ZDcO4lPV6KEAziuUL08AurUYbE=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=qGn/0RpawzHOsnFvI+rH6yVY8sEZBQ4Ru9LrvwomnSMOBM7gbURtsNY9Tltn1QPmO 7b4pV2JXHvEvlBzcG0GyAS17NEYI9ssMVLZdBocr77Hkrm5k7gQbEEVLaAu7SvxW1/ yTiGqcWzIszCb+0rVsvn4BrBdeONccFpI69Yk+rDPB05jmJNtAk0D43Z/pLcbaUdl4 Af6dWoKh9cva+nTOa6RA4ORrWVuwIJvsBa6ziNpmn9hL8tHtMdkI03cCT36xZ2lF9Y 4kfbRDe+YPyR1bd7yqQ7gbnk2MCWvLagTJkx0DATywvCPBs/muZq/qqLtMeaOBHncE //vufIbOmc8fA== Received: from [10.30.226.235] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-rhel9-1.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33D6F380CEDD; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 22:30:35 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: stmmac: Correct usage of maximum queue number macros From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Message-Id: <174043623374.3631570.5317337904130972259.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 22:30:33 +0000 References: <20250221051818.4163678-1-hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com> In-Reply-To: <20250221051818.4163678-1-hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com> To: Kunihiko Hayashi Cc: alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk, chenhuacai@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello: This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main) by Jakub Kicinski : On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 14:18:18 +0900 you wrote: > The maximum numbers of each Rx and Tx queues are defined by > MTL_MAX_RX_QUEUES and MTL_MAX_TX_QUEUES respectively. > > There are some places where Rx and Tx are used in reverse. There is no > issue when the Tx and Rx macros have the same value, but should correct > usage of macros for maximum queue number to keep consistency and prevent > unexpected mistakes. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [net-next,v2] net: stmmac: Correct usage of maximum queue number macros https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/352bc4513ec3 You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html