From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 981DAC433DF for ; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 20:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 720E9206B7 for ; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 20:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="cF7pJ2HF" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727846AbgFNUTk (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Jun 2020 16:19:40 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:48416 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727125AbgFNUTk (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Jun 2020 16:19:40 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1592165978; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=kFnjBBxZoYPqHYe1qb3puDWa9sIB09spfxyDPU0xHcw=; b=cF7pJ2HFMhi6611pCOZa53rw3BY6hr1DWLjjDqqxPMC0lm/JfMDEBvsCtDZdhLNjdQMuPb bMYoWit7JEcFOccNGvXtK2tGbiNEsdFv/KY5Ycu1TnLW7VfpUPxLhOM0bEbNZzoOcpNKXZ MMIDPNjICQOQcM0FNkFa5Qx/hXHETug= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-389-JJlrtXMePiK3O3EITrk7xw-1; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 16:19:34 -0400 X-MC-Unique: JJlrtXMePiK3O3EITrk7xw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77F8E19067E0; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 20:19:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (ovpn-114-66.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.114.66]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D9A578F0A; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 20:19:25 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <9feded75-4b45-2821-287b-af00ec5f910f@al2klimov.de> References: <9feded75-4b45-2821-287b-af00ec5f910f@al2klimov.de> To: "Alexander A. Klimov" Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Pablo Neira Ayuso , Jozsef Kadlecsik , Florian Westphal , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Alan Stern , Andrea Parri , Will Deacon , Peter Zijlstra , Boqun Feng , Nicholas Piggin , Jade Alglave , Luc Maranget , "Paul E. McKenney" , Akira Yokosawa , Daniel Lustig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Good idea to rename files in include/uapi/ ? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <174101.1592165965.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2020 21:19:25 +0100 Message-ID: <174102.1592165965@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alexander A. Klimov wrote: > *Is it a good idea to rename files in include/uapi/ ?* Very likely not. If programs out there are going to be built on a case-sensitive filesystem (which happens all the time), they're going to break if you rename the headers. We're kind of stuck with them. David