From: "tip-bot2 for Pawan Gupta" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
"Borislav Petkov (AMD)" <bp@alien8.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: x86/core] x86/rfds: Exclude P-only parts from the RFDS affected list
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 11:03:55 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <174238223554.14745.16324041214602055294.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250311-add-cpu-type-v8-5-e8514dcaaff2@linux.intel.com>
The following commit has been merged into the x86/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 722fa0dba74f206999244facb177a8bfe3d513e6
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/722fa0dba74f206999244facb177a8bfe3d513e6
Author: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 08:03:08 -07:00
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitterDate: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 11:17:23 +01:00
x86/rfds: Exclude P-only parts from the RFDS affected list
The affected CPU table (cpu_vuln_blacklist) marks Alderlake and Raptorlake
P-only parts affected by RFDS. This is not true because only E-cores are
affected by RFDS. With the current family/model matching it is not possible
to differentiate the unaffected parts, as the affected and unaffected
hybrid variants have the same model number.
Add a cpu-type match as well for such parts so as to exclude P-only parts
being marked as affected.
Note, family/model and cpu-type enumeration could be inaccurate in
virtualized environments. In a guest affected status is decided by RFDS_NO
and RFDS_CLEAR bits exposed by VMMs.
Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250311-add-cpu-type-v8-5-e8514dcaaff2@linux.intel.com
---
Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/reg-file-data-sampling.rst | 8 +-------
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 7 ++++--
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/reg-file-data-sampling.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/reg-file-data-sampling.rst
index 0585d02..ad15417 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/reg-file-data-sampling.rst
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/reg-file-data-sampling.rst
@@ -29,14 +29,6 @@ Below is the list of affected Intel processors [#f1]_:
RAPTORLAKE_S 06_BFH
=================== ============
-As an exception to this table, Intel Xeon E family parts ALDERLAKE(06_97H) and
-RAPTORLAKE(06_B7H) codenamed Catlow are not affected. They are reported as
-vulnerable in Linux because they share the same family/model with an affected
-part. Unlike their affected counterparts, they do not enumerate RFDS_CLEAR or
-CPUID.HYBRID. This information could be used to distinguish between the
-affected and unaffected parts, but it is deemed not worth adding complexity as
-the reporting is fixed automatically when these parts enumerate RFDS_NO.
-
Mitigation
==========
Intel released a microcode update that enables software to clear sensitive
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index 5809534..a2b9a79 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -1203,6 +1203,9 @@ static const __initconst struct x86_cpu_id cpu_vuln_whitelist[] = {
#define VULNBL_INTEL_STEPS(vfm, max_stepping, issues) \
X86_MATCH_VFM_STEPS(vfm, X86_STEP_MIN, max_stepping, issues)
+#define VULNBL_INTEL_TYPE(vfm, cpu_type, issues) \
+ X86_MATCH_VFM_CPU_TYPE(vfm, INTEL_CPU_TYPE_##cpu_type, issues)
+
#define VULNBL_AMD(family, blacklist) \
VULNBL(AMD, family, X86_MODEL_ANY, blacklist)
@@ -1251,9 +1254,9 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id cpu_vuln_blacklist[] __initconst = {
VULNBL_INTEL_STEPS(INTEL_TIGERLAKE, X86_STEP_MAX, GDS),
VULNBL_INTEL_STEPS(INTEL_LAKEFIELD, X86_STEP_MAX, MMIO | MMIO_SBDS | RETBLEED),
VULNBL_INTEL_STEPS(INTEL_ROCKETLAKE, X86_STEP_MAX, MMIO | RETBLEED | GDS),
- VULNBL_INTEL_STEPS(INTEL_ALDERLAKE, X86_STEP_MAX, RFDS),
+ VULNBL_INTEL_TYPE(INTEL_ALDERLAKE, ATOM, RFDS),
VULNBL_INTEL_STEPS(INTEL_ALDERLAKE_L, X86_STEP_MAX, RFDS),
- VULNBL_INTEL_STEPS(INTEL_RAPTORLAKE, X86_STEP_MAX, RFDS),
+ VULNBL_INTEL_TYPE(INTEL_RAPTORLAKE, ATOM, RFDS),
VULNBL_INTEL_STEPS(INTEL_RAPTORLAKE_P, X86_STEP_MAX, RFDS),
VULNBL_INTEL_STEPS(INTEL_RAPTORLAKE_S, X86_STEP_MAX, RFDS),
VULNBL_INTEL_STEPS(INTEL_ATOM_GRACEMONT, X86_STEP_MAX, RFDS),
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-19 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-11 15:01 [PATCH v8 0/5] Utilize cpu-type for CPU matching Pawan Gupta
2025-03-11 15:02 ` [PATCH v8 1/5] x86/cpu: Fix the description of X86_MATCH_VFM_STEPS() Pawan Gupta
2025-03-12 9:54 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Pawan Gupta
2025-03-19 11:03 ` [tip: x86/core] " tip-bot2 for Pawan Gupta
2025-03-11 15:02 ` [PATCH v8 2/5] x86/cpu: Name CPU matching macro more generically (and shorten) Pawan Gupta
2025-03-12 9:54 ` [tip: x86/cpu] x86/cpu: Shorten CPU matching macro tip-bot2 for Pawan Gupta
2025-03-19 11:03 ` [tip: x86/core] " tip-bot2 for Pawan Gupta
2025-03-11 15:02 ` [PATCH v8 3/5] x86/cpu: Add cpu_type to struct x86_cpu_id Pawan Gupta
2025-03-12 9:54 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Pawan Gupta
2025-03-19 11:03 ` [tip: x86/core] " tip-bot2 for Pawan Gupta
2025-03-11 15:02 ` [PATCH v8 4/5] x86/cpu: Update x86_match_cpu() to also use cpu-type Pawan Gupta
2025-03-12 9:54 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Pawan Gupta
2025-03-19 11:03 ` [tip: x86/core] " tip-bot2 for Pawan Gupta
2025-03-11 15:03 ` [PATCH v8 5/5] x86/rfds: Exclude P-only parts from the RFDS affected list Pawan Gupta
2025-03-12 9:54 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Pawan Gupta
2025-03-19 11:03 ` tip-bot2 for Pawan Gupta [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=174238223554.14745.16324041214602055294.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
--to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®