mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tip-bot2 for Jann Horn" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: x86/urgent] x86/entry: Fix ORC unwinder for PUSH_REGS with save_ret=1
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 07:46:16 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <174288877681.14745.1013174676126785609.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250325-2025-03-unwind-fixes-v1-1-acd774364768@google.com>

The following commit has been merged into the x86/urgent branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     57e2428f8df8263275344566e02c277648a4b7f1
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/57e2428f8df8263275344566e02c277648a4b7f1
Author:        Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
AuthorDate:    Tue, 25 Mar 2025 03:01:22 +01:00
Committer:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitterDate: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 08:30:43 +01:00

x86/entry: Fix ORC unwinder for PUSH_REGS with save_ret=1

PUSH_REGS with save_ret=1 is used by interrupt entry helper functions that
initially start with a UNWIND_HINT_FUNC ORC state.

However, save_ret=1 means that we clobber the helper function's return
address (and then later restore the return address further down on the
stack); after that point, the only thing on the stack we can unwind through
is the IRET frame, so use UNWIND_HINT_IRET_REGS until we have a full
pt_regs frame.

( An alternate approach would be to move the pt_regs->di overwrite down
  such that it is the final step of pt_regs setup; but I don't want to
  rearrange entry code just to make unwinding a tiny bit more elegant. )

Fixes: 9e809d15d6b6 ("x86/entry: Reduce the code footprint of the 'idtentry' macro")
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250325-2025-03-unwind-fixes-v1-1-acd774364768@google.com
---
 arch/x86/entry/calling.h | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/calling.h b/arch/x86/entry/calling.h
index cb0911c..d83236b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/calling.h
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/calling.h
@@ -70,6 +70,8 @@ For 32-bit we have the following conventions - kernel is built with
 	pushq	%rsi		/* pt_regs->si */
 	movq	8(%rsp), %rsi	/* temporarily store the return address in %rsi */
 	movq	%rdi, 8(%rsp)	/* pt_regs->di (overwriting original return address) */
+	/* We just clobbered the return address - use the IRET frame for unwinding: */
+	UNWIND_HINT_IRET_REGS offset=3*8
 	.else
 	pushq   %rdi		/* pt_regs->di */
 	pushq   %rsi		/* pt_regs->si */

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-25  7:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-25  2:01 [PATCH 0/2] x86 unwind fixes (1 unwinder fix, 1 missing entry ORC annotation) Jann Horn
2025-03-25  2:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/entry: Fix ORC for PUSH_REGS with save_ret=1 Jann Horn
2025-03-25  7:46   ` tip-bot2 for Jann Horn [this message]
2025-03-25  2:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/dumpstack: Fix broken unwinding from exception stacks Jann Horn
2025-03-25  2:24   ` Jann Horn
2025-03-25  7:31     ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-25  7:46   ` [tip: x86/urgent] x86/dumpstack: Fix inaccurate unwinding from exception stacks due to misplaced assignment tip-bot2 for Jann Horn
2025-03-25 13:27   ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/dumpstack: Fix broken unwinding from exception stacks Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=174288877681.14745.1013174676126785609.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
    --to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®