From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04AAF23A98A; Mon, 7 Apr 2025 11:51:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744026680; cv=none; b=jqbhJHGNea98kiblJYVFTh79nkki6w0KamRZfG8UbM+zvvmqlroawsM4l6a8Jisb47l3ldHWVZr73i97LXfF4xwX2HWfS5WUkR3k73wbeLiQtjZgX3ggqlGOcTmyjAm7bqoI0qGvldSgLXVXV/ywPhYyd5jhAG+5oG/ob4oTO7I= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744026680; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Ik3s3Zrm66CWBd2uHsVOVNJBfGhDtUFb3oOjqByk5iE=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Message-Id:Date: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Vrk4k1OY/J1FCjTPVmZzNhBUP60FoyUQvH0uIwVTNuKOPzWCduP6PjF4Ct2EuEZz0FUFjJlEhP7YG6hJA3UNBD9MgEXqcBWeRrlme7rYfeWgaeyRGjIV1hAiKvKOeiCMQ8WTADeDgK6038QbvCywCM49QcjB71bDNqwOWhXd3L4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=nm5H3CY4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="nm5H3CY4" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1744026679; x=1775562679; h=from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:message-id: date:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ik3s3Zrm66CWBd2uHsVOVNJBfGhDtUFb3oOjqByk5iE=; b=nm5H3CY4J342u68AgyUFtBy01/evPR15S9NGIqSRGWOrnWaq/Ra7BB+J 2rAbiZCwqUjRpftQ4tJ530TfIsM0XI1q3lyijZwPRC4k68n+7pM6aElEn pj2+vh5H9oGni76ApAgnESyOm9qmjBd0q27f66gFTcdu9aY0iHXpDffVc emdK7Kk4euaTVPBnISDKS9HI4bRsaAmgCLEnBsHGBPc1dT4mOgE9czeaS E6Q/pTUgKgHJK3yhSxjw2gsRyErIzGqTWciqlCAIAIqDM07VTqUNGU755 fUwZa3M59fX2GjyIZU4J506mVc4wXBaGXVoDPIH3Rp5YOl+6Oc5J2GF8g g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 3nPEeTzxTE2ud3CeNYMSeQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: VXxQDtMuQryrou8ncbOAOw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11397"; a="45499628" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,194,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="45499628" Received: from fmviesa003.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.143]) by orvoesa108.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Apr 2025 04:51:19 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: WImpXkGZRc6sKC/XWFNbfg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: ffyjnnGDQ267Y9MuZMaxKg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,194,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="132071774" Received: from ijarvine-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.229]) by fmviesa003-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Apr 2025 04:51:16 -0700 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ilpo=20J=C3=A4rvinen?= To: Hans de Goede , David E Box , Andy Shevchenko , Choong Yong Liang Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20250313085526.1439092-1-yong.liang.choong@linux.intel.com> References: <20250313085526.1439092-1-yong.liang.choong@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: add option to build without ACPI Message-Id: <174402667086.2623.12054422494397087928.b4-ty@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2025 14:51:10 +0300 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.13.0 On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 16:55:26 +0800, Choong Yong Liang wrote: > Introduce a configuration option that allows users to build the > intel_pmc_ipc driver without ACPI support. This is useful for > systems where ACPI is not available or desired. > > Based on the discussion from the patch [1], it was necessary to > provide this option to accommodate specific use cases. > > [...] Thank you for your contribution, it has been applied to my local review-ilpo-fixes branch. Note it will show up in the public platform-drivers-x86/review-ilpo-fixes branch only once I've pushed my local branch there, which might take a while. The list of commits applied: [1/1] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: add option to build without ACPI commit: d8455a63f731b4f585acc4d49fd7ad78db63b3d0 -- i.