From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59F4F23958E; Thu, 17 Apr 2025 11:18:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744888724; cv=none; b=rXnZg2c77m3rOgOIQYMbQQPkkXZAJRgQoifdLbJeWkoq3ikkDFNFjyZtIFRAwnpLzzD4fDWiZu3Y2lnQQMgdUaFrmO+j3QqGdrLhBsz+1FPC/oLygUdF64tQVRig8ng3V9w/4rRtsiQweBCVjuIJsdqLTsT99owtwxHTj9lTPGw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744888724; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7DcjQ1DXZHJuotHGzYuDvwCSxpaG9C9yPkh4AHK8f/4=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Message-Id:Date: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=nzRiPsLR4zN4TREfzz+kVSRV34najHgJoohS3VP8ADIkmzKt54SmsgReD6bsZlF0NDw2ywLMrTVGflRBkBErXzMq5wf6w8hEUvlcMYzAYW9VeS0MuXdDoBC1m6yYrZ5a4rEi24lPoK/uX3UYGi0jTh4LmYAkOvST7g7vtDED85g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=a1vn59Zq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="a1vn59Zq" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1744888724; x=1776424724; h=from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:message-id: date:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7DcjQ1DXZHJuotHGzYuDvwCSxpaG9C9yPkh4AHK8f/4=; b=a1vn59ZqUDbBnNLz8lAlOvPPawZ1FSE5ADY0r9qGpKhSyGWGlchZjuf4 lDV2hVamklGv8sWaNVN4sMNHb8ATBbxGr1o1yb/prVnlqfpb10kjqxDr4 ltT+tnvTe2y4em1C29kxcxsBTfWrN9VM/HZmlWQOSSxXEazBMgzLg0kRH X/kNg+U54A2TRSPfWlF+cDGqkCYLfQ776Ou1aTfhHOSz9131oHLtBAQgv rArv3EwX5l0U04JRodpFCh4JV0JjN3loEzVRspx27wW7IFWWlWuqJttua E4sqRj7jRozCui30/PFU57Op5L4FBSW68Z5BbD6V5CB5zIyQdrRz+uzLN g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: W71sshEeQsSCTCQ7R8ghXw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: LUB+JUVRQW6M26KWSBG2pw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11405"; a="46366558" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,218,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="46366558" Received: from fmviesa009.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.149]) by orvoesa111.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Apr 2025 04:18:43 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: w4ZSW/hEREe5FLKsI9cMmQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: +yDStAT+R/WzNPUDrzRnfQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,218,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="131677643" Received: from ijarvine-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.144]) by fmviesa009-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Apr 2025 04:18:40 -0700 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ilpo=20J=C3=A4rvinen?= To: srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com, hdegoede@redhat.com, shouyeliu Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Shouye Liu In-Reply-To: <20250417032321.75580-1-shouyeliu@gmail.com> References: <20250417032321.75580-1-shouyeliu@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] platform/x86/intel-uncore-freq: Fix missing uncore sysfs during CPU hotplug Message-Id: <174488871345.2548.2694845839583512280.b4-ty@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 14:18:33 +0300 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.13.0 On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 11:23:21 +0800, shouyeliu wrote: > In certain situations, the sysfs for uncore may not be present when all > CPUs in a package are offlined and then brought back online after boot. > > This issue can occur if there is an error in adding the sysfs entry due > to a memory allocation failure. Retrying to bring the CPUs online will > not resolve the issue, as the uncore_cpu_mask is already set for the > package before the failure condition occurs. > > [...] Thank you for your contribution, it has been applied to my local review-ilpo-fixes branch. Note it will show up in the public platform-drivers-x86/review-ilpo-fixes branch only once I've pushed my local branch there, which might take a while. The list of commits applied: [1/1] platform/x86/intel-uncore-freq: Fix missing uncore sysfs during CPU hotplug commit: 8d6955ed76e8a47115f2ea1d9c263ee6f505d737 -- i.