[tip: locking/core] locking/lockdep: Move hlock_equal() to the respective #ifdeffery

["tip-bot2 for Andy Shevchenko" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>]

The following commit has been merged into the locking/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     96ca1830e1219eda431702eb9a74225e8fe3ccc0
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/96ca1830e1219eda431702eb9a74225e8fe3ccc0
Author:        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
AuthorDate:    Mon, 05 May 2025 21:20:47 -07:00
Committer:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitterDate: Tue, 06 May 2025 18:34:31 +02:00

locking/lockdep: Move hlock_equal() to the respective #ifdeffery

When hlock_equal() is unused, it prevents kernel builds with clang,
`make W=1` and CONFIG_WERROR=y, CONFIG_LOCKDEP=y and
CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SMALL=n:

  lockdep.c:2005:20: error: unused function 'hlock_equal' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]

Fix this by moving the function to the respective existing ifdeffery
for its the only user.

See also:

  6863f5643dd7 ("kbuild: allow Clang to find unused static inline functions for W=1 build")

Fixes: 68e305678583 ("lockdep: Adjust check_redundant() for recursive read change")
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>
Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250506042049.50060-2-boqun.feng@gmail.com
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 58d78a3..546e928 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -1977,41 +1977,6 @@ print_circular_bug_header(struct lock_list *entry, unsigned int depth,
 }
 
 /*
- * We are about to add A -> B into the dependency graph, and in __bfs() a
- * strong dependency path A -> .. -> B is found: hlock_class equals
- * entry->class.
- *
- * If A -> .. -> B can replace A -> B in any __bfs() search (means the former
- * is _stronger_ than or equal to the latter), we consider A -> B as redundant.
- * For example if A -> .. -> B is -(EN)-> (i.e. A -(E*)-> .. -(*N)-> B), and A
- * -> B is -(ER)-> or -(EN)->, then we don't need to add A -> B into the
- * dependency graph, as any strong path ..-> A -> B ->.. we can get with
- * having dependency A -> B, we could already get a equivalent path ..-> A ->
- * .. -> B -> .. with A -> .. -> B. Therefore A -> B is redundant.
- *
- * We need to make sure both the start and the end of A -> .. -> B is not
- * weaker than A -> B. For the start part, please see the comment in
- * check_redundant(). For the end part, we need:
- *
- * Either
- *
- *     a) A -> B is -(*R)-> (everything is not weaker than that)
- *
- * or
- *
- *     b) A -> .. -> B is -(*N)-> (nothing is stronger than this)
- *
- */
-static inline bool hlock_equal(struct lock_list *entry, void *data)
-{
-	struct held_lock *hlock = (struct held_lock *)data;
-
-	return hlock_class(hlock) == entry->class && /* Found A -> .. -> B */
-	       (hlock->read == 2 ||  /* A -> B is -(*R)-> */
-		!entry->only_xr); /* A -> .. -> B is -(*N)-> */
-}
-
-/*
  * We are about to add B -> A into the dependency graph, and in __bfs() a
  * strong dependency path A -> .. -> B is found: hlock_class equals
  * entry->class.
@@ -2916,6 +2881,41 @@ static inline bool usage_skip(struct lock_list *entry, void *mask)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SMALL
 /*
+ * We are about to add A -> B into the dependency graph, and in __bfs() a
+ * strong dependency path A -> .. -> B is found: hlock_class equals
+ * entry->class.
+ *
+ * If A -> .. -> B can replace A -> B in any __bfs() search (means the former
+ * is _stronger_ than or equal to the latter), we consider A -> B as redundant.
+ * For example if A -> .. -> B is -(EN)-> (i.e. A -(E*)-> .. -(*N)-> B), and A
+ * -> B is -(ER)-> or -(EN)->, then we don't need to add A -> B into the
+ * dependency graph, as any strong path ..-> A -> B ->.. we can get with
+ * having dependency A -> B, we could already get a equivalent path ..-> A ->
+ * .. -> B -> .. with A -> .. -> B. Therefore A -> B is redundant.
+ *
+ * We need to make sure both the start and the end of A -> .. -> B is not
+ * weaker than A -> B. For the start part, please see the comment in
+ * check_redundant(). For the end part, we need:
+ *
+ * Either
+ *
+ *     a) A -> B is -(*R)-> (everything is not weaker than that)
+ *
+ * or
+ *
+ *     b) A -> .. -> B is -(*N)-> (nothing is stronger than this)
+ *
+ */
+static inline bool hlock_equal(struct lock_list *entry, void *data)
+{
+	struct held_lock *hlock = (struct held_lock *)data;
+
+	return hlock_class(hlock) == entry->class && /* Found A -> .. -> B */
+	       (hlock->read == 2 ||  /* A -> B is -(*R)-> */
+		!entry->only_xr); /* A -> .. -> B is -(*N)-> */
+}
+
+/*
  * Check that the dependency graph starting at <src> can lead to
  * <target> or not. If it can, <src> -> <target> dependency is already
  * in the graph.