From: "tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: x86/msr] um: Add UML version of <asm/tsc.h> to define rdtsc()
Date: Wed, 07 May 2025 18:40:45 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <174664324585.406.10812098910624084030.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202505080003.0t7ewxGp-lkp@intel.com>
The following commit has been merged into the x86/msr branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 24b58adaa7508d9d2cdb6bca44803954baf24459
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/24b58adaa7508d9d2cdb6bca44803954baf24459
Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
AuthorDate: Wed, 07 May 2025 20:18:22 +02:00
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitterDate: Wed, 07 May 2025 20:30:39 +02:00
um: Add UML version of <asm/tsc.h> to define rdtsc()
In the x86 tree rdtsc() methods got moved out of <asm/msr.h>, but this
broke UML, as the x86 version of <asm/tsc.h> cannot be used by UML as-is:
CC [M] drivers/accel/habanalabs/common/habanalabs_ioctl.o
In file included from drivers/accel/habanalabs/common/habanalabs_ioctl.c:20:
./arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h:70:28: error: conflicting types for ‘cycles_t’; have ‘long long unsigned int’
70 | typedef unsigned long long cycles_t;
| ^~~~~~~~
In file included from ./arch/um/include/asm/timex.h:7,
from ./include/linux/timex.h:67,
from ./include/linux/time32.h:13,
from ./include/linux/time.h:60,
from ./include/linux/skbuff.h:15,
from ./include/linux/if_ether.h:19,
from ./include/linux/habanalabs/cpucp_if.h:12,
from drivers/accel/habanalabs/common/habanalabs.h:11,
from drivers/accel/habanalabs/common/habanalabs_ioctl.c:11:
./include/asm-generic/timex.h:8:23: note: previous declaration of ‘cycles_t’ with type ‘cycles_t’ {aka ‘long unsigned int’}
8 | typedef unsigned long cycles_t;
| ^~~~~~~~
To resolve these kinds of problems and to allow <asm/tsc.h> to be included on UML,
add a simplified version of <asm/tsc.h>, which only adds the rdtsc() definition.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202505080003.0t7ewxGp-lkp@intel.com
---
arch/um/include/asm/tsc.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 arch/um/include/asm/tsc.h
diff --git a/arch/um/include/asm/tsc.h b/arch/um/include/asm/tsc.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a52b0e4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/um/include/asm/tsc.h
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef _ASM_UM_TSC_H
+#define _ASM_UM_TSC_H
+
+#include <asm/asm.h>
+
+/**
+ * rdtsc() - returns the current TSC without ordering constraints
+ *
+ * rdtsc() returns the result of RDTSC as a 64-bit integer. The
+ * only ordering constraint it supplies is the ordering implied by
+ * "asm volatile": it will put the RDTSC in the place you expect. The
+ * CPU can and will speculatively execute that RDTSC, though, so the
+ * results can be non-monotonic if compared on different CPUs.
+ */
+static __always_inline u64 rdtsc(void)
+{
+ EAX_EDX_DECLARE_ARGS(val, low, high);
+
+ asm volatile("rdtsc" : EAX_EDX_RET(val, low, high));
+
+ return EAX_EDX_VAL(val, low, high);
+}
+
+#endif /* _ASM_UM_TSC_H */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-07 18:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-07 16:41 [tip:x86/msr 5/19] drivers/accel/habanalabs/common/habanalabs_ioctl.c:326:23: error: call to undeclared function 'rdtsc'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations kernel test robot
2025-05-07 18:40 ` [tip: x86/msr] accel/habanalabs: Add explicit include of <asm/tsc.h> to pick up the rdtsc() definition tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-05-07 18:40 ` tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar [this message]
2025-05-07 18:47 ` [tip: x86/msr] um: Add UML version of <asm/tsc.h> to define rdtsc() Ingo Molnar
2025-05-07 20:36 ` Johannes Berg
2025-05-08 8:57 ` [PATCH -v2] accel/habanalabs: Don't build the driver on UML Ingo Molnar
2025-05-08 9:02 ` Johannes Berg
2025-05-08 9:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-08 9:09 ` [tip: x86/msr] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=174664324585.406.10812098910624084030.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
--to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®