From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Cc: andrew@lunn.ch, hkallweit1@gmail.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, richardcochran@gmail.com,
kory.maincent@bootlin.com, shannon.nelson@amd.com,
rrameshbabu@nvidia.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
quentin.schulz@bootlin.com, atenart@kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net: phy: mscc: Fix memory leak when using one step timestamping
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 02:30:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <174839943674.1866481.1704860946542275477.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250522115722.2827199-1-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Thu, 22 May 2025 13:57:22 +0200 you wrote:
> Fix memory leak when running one-step timestamping. When running
> one-step sync timestamping, the HW is configured to insert the TX time
> into the frame, so there is no reason to keep the skb anymore. As in
> this case the HW will never generate an interrupt to say that the frame
> was timestamped, then the frame will never released.
> Fix this by freeing the frame in case of one-step timestamping.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net,v2] net: phy: mscc: Fix memory leak when using one step timestamping
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/846992645b25
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-28 2:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-22 11:57 Horatiu Vultur
2025-05-22 12:39 ` Antoine Tenart
2025-05-28 2:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=174839943674.1866481.1704860946542275477.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=atenart@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
--cc=kory.maincent@bootlin.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=quentin.schulz@bootlin.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=rrameshbabu@nvidia.com \
--cc=shannon.nelson@amd.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®