From: "tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@kernel.org>,
Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: x86/urgent] x86/its: explicitly manage permissions for ITS pages
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 09:30:29 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <174963422924.406.14483786184878538014.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250603111446.2609381-5-rppt@kernel.org>
The following commit has been merged into the x86/urgent branch of tip:
Commit-ID: a82b26451de126a5ae130361081986bc459afe9b
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/a82b26451de126a5ae130361081986bc459afe9b
Author: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
AuthorDate: Tue, 03 Jun 2025 14:14:44 +03:00
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CommitterDate: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 11:20:52 +02:00
x86/its: explicitly manage permissions for ITS pages
execmem_alloc() sets permissions differently depending on the kernel
configuration, CPU support for PSE and whether a page is allocated
before or after mark_rodata_ro().
Add tracking for pages allocated for ITS when patching the core kernel
and make sure the permissions for ITS pages are explicitly managed for
both kernel and module allocations.
Fixes: 872df34d7c51 ("x86/its: Use dynamic thunks for indirect branches")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Co-developed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250603111446.2609381-5-rppt@kernel.org
---
arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
index b50fe6c..6455f7f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
@@ -116,6 +116,24 @@ static struct module *its_mod;
#endif
static void *its_page;
static unsigned int its_offset;
+struct its_array its_pages;
+
+static void *__its_alloc(struct its_array *pages)
+{
+ void *page __free(execmem) = execmem_alloc(EXECMEM_MODULE_TEXT, PAGE_SIZE);
+ if (!page)
+ return NULL;
+
+ void *tmp = krealloc(pages->pages, (pages->num+1) * sizeof(void *),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!tmp)
+ return NULL;
+
+ pages->pages = tmp;
+ pages->pages[pages->num++] = page;
+
+ return no_free_ptr(page);
+}
/* Initialize a thunk with the "jmp *reg; int3" instructions. */
static void *its_init_thunk(void *thunk, int reg)
@@ -151,6 +169,21 @@ static void *its_init_thunk(void *thunk, int reg)
return thunk + offset;
}
+static void its_pages_protect(struct its_array *pages)
+{
+ for (int i = 0; i < pages->num; i++) {
+ void *page = pages->pages[i];
+ execmem_restore_rox(page, PAGE_SIZE);
+ }
+}
+
+static void its_fini_core(void)
+{
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX))
+ its_pages_protect(&its_pages);
+ kfree(its_pages.pages);
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
void its_init_mod(struct module *mod)
{
@@ -173,10 +206,8 @@ void its_fini_mod(struct module *mod)
its_page = NULL;
mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
- for (int i = 0; i < mod->arch.its_pages.num; i++) {
- void *page = mod->arch.its_pages.pages[i];
- execmem_restore_rox(page, PAGE_SIZE);
- }
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX))
+ its_pages_protect(&mod->arch.its_pages);
}
void its_free_mod(struct module *mod)
@@ -194,28 +225,23 @@ void its_free_mod(struct module *mod)
static void *its_alloc(void)
{
- void *page __free(execmem) = execmem_alloc(EXECMEM_MODULE_TEXT, PAGE_SIZE);
+ struct its_array *pages = &its_pages;
+ void *page;
+#ifdef CONFIG_MODULE
+ if (its_mod)
+ pages = &its_mod->arch.its_pages;
+#endif
+
+ page = __its_alloc(pages);
if (!page)
return NULL;
-#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
- if (its_mod) {
- struct its_array *pages = &its_mod->arch.its_pages;
- void *tmp = krealloc(pages->pages,
- (pages->num+1) * sizeof(void *),
- GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!tmp)
- return NULL;
-
- pages->pages = tmp;
- pages->pages[pages->num++] = page;
+ execmem_make_temp_rw(page, PAGE_SIZE);
+ if (pages == &its_pages)
+ set_memory_x((unsigned long)page, 1);
- execmem_make_temp_rw(page, PAGE_SIZE);
- }
-#endif /* CONFIG_MODULES */
-
- return no_free_ptr(page);
+ return page;
}
static void *its_allocate_thunk(int reg)
@@ -269,7 +295,9 @@ u8 *its_static_thunk(int reg)
return thunk;
}
-#endif
+#else
+static inline void its_fini_core(void) {}
+#endif /* CONFIG_MITIGATION_ITS */
/*
* Nomenclature for variable names to simplify and clarify this code and ease
@@ -2339,6 +2367,8 @@ void __init alternative_instructions(void)
apply_retpolines(__retpoline_sites, __retpoline_sites_end);
apply_returns(__return_sites, __return_sites_end);
+ its_fini_core();
+
/*
* Adjust all CALL instructions to point to func()-10, including
* those in .altinstr_replacement.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-11 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-03 11:14 [PATCH 0/5] Fixes for ITS mitigation and execmem Mike Rapoport
2025-06-03 11:14 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86/mm/pat: don't collapse pages without PSE set Mike Rapoport
2025-06-03 11:14 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86/Kconfig: only enable ROX cache in execmem when STRICT_MODULE_RWX is set Mike Rapoport
2025-06-11 9:30 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2025-06-03 11:14 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86/its: move its_pages array to struct mod_arch_specific Mike Rapoport
2025-06-11 9:30 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2025-06-03 11:14 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86/its: explicitly manage permissions for ITS pages Mike Rapoport
2025-06-03 13:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-03 14:36 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-06-03 14:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-11 21:09 ` Chuck Zmudzinski
2025-06-05 9:23 ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-06-11 9:30 ` tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra (Intel) [this message]
2025-06-03 11:14 ` [PATCH 5/5] Revert "mm/execmem: Unify early execmem_cache behaviour" Mike Rapoport
2025-06-11 9:30 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2025-06-10 6:00 ` [PATCH 0/5] Fixes for ITS mitigation and execmem Jürgen Groß
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=174963422924.406.14483786184878538014.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
--to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nik.borisov@suse.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®