From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, andrew@lunn.ch, kuba@kernel.org,
edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com,
horms@kernel.org, hkallweit1@gmail.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, herve.codina@bootlin.com,
romain.gantois@bootlin.com, shaojijie@huawei.com,
larysa.zaremba@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net: phy: phy_caps: Don't skip better duplex macth on non-exact match
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 15:10:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <174974104149.4173578.17008792239635511741.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250606094321.483602-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 11:43:20 +0200 you wrote:
> When performing a non-exact phy_caps lookup, we are looking for a
> supported mode that matches as closely as possible the passed speed/duplex.
>
> Blamed patch broke that logic by returning a match too early in case
> the caller asks for half-duplex, as a full-duplex linkmode may match
> first, and returned as a non-exact match without even trying to mach on
> half-duplex modes.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net,v2] net: phy: phy_caps: Don't skip better duplex macth on non-exact match
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/d4e6cb324dcc
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-12 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-06 9:43 Maxime Chevallier
2025-06-12 15:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=174974104149.4173578.17008792239635511741.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=larysa.zaremba@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=romain.gantois@bootlin.com \
--cc=shaojijie@huawei.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®