From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCC9D2DFA33; Fri, 13 Jun 2025 12:09:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.13 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749816597; cv=none; b=kOw+aDNIBQJSH6m/drvyhOiGPpMS2EL2Y+9KIcwFDjaNLxeQgSaPxqWVYuXrCzT3hGEDjgEMHbZscyjVDB1DzozDqAw8Y/T9P/ZNZ0WuRqJBJ44ZjCDxQnJIEBohv5oWgBXB413Gz9dSLDn45crLIB0YrPkPtHZw+qqj79McpaQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749816597; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0tu06tAr2kdXFxrJ8tihj6vbryL9Qfdx8mrPLEegIVw=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Message-Id:Date: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=iNf4DPhf91R2rg4wROW1qKNSK7zGP5DKKio609N5LFtOjXL6smn35Z74dQ4wxGDjSljgOzF145D9i+lB8kxJby+fODbeiC2AdjU153g6EqD9dmMjEXyeow5Y/i9MoqVB0o4YV6KABiC8IHSbTnbEcjQcT5HKk1xz1nCW2DsNjkk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=cKfoTTo1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="cKfoTTo1" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1749816596; x=1781352596; h=from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:message-id: date:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0tu06tAr2kdXFxrJ8tihj6vbryL9Qfdx8mrPLEegIVw=; b=cKfoTTo18auW26Y7MsmTT9WgYcZk+wSYJ96pT+WtFUENT7iD0fhWYn6g MC1FN3vKnp8ySHIwE/hYrbUiWpef4L/Yic91Le5kNFpVfD/X/Q3QD/LGI Kw2+j5a5iDePAsyKz5KncJ69roUg49l73w5m/rTXTqyCfefqgb0ACygGM nIa2CmD32UleOc6zhuHjzdo0mthyTtxlvOjB1P/eHv2gvW8GHlx6Z+1bq DGCFZlHx6bsMG6zW2BMtokyJAKtYqTUGbaDk3Eizc0AQxrov9Hvy1R9Py LbDkUtyqRS90bzROJcGVFaoJ93V+65YbS1k5CIm5Ae7nmyttFzMRzuHQc w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: UPMDz1gyTlejUYcE2dbjcQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: BpzhreYkQsSMGvLHo9ySkg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11463"; a="63066198" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,233,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="63066198" Received: from fmviesa002.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.142]) by orvoesa105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Jun 2025 05:09:55 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: FQ31BINFSwO6SRjAqaOpZA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: tsugnzQ4S1aUP4iOr0fMfg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,233,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="170994936" Received: from ijarvine-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.102]) by fmviesa002-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Jun 2025 05:09:52 -0700 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ilpo=20J=C3=A4rvinen?= To: Armin Wolf , Hans de Goede , Kurt Borja Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, Dell.Client.Kernel@dell.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Cihan Ozakca , stable@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20250611-m16-rev-v1-1-72d13bad03c9@gmail.com> References: <20250611-m16-rev-v1-1-72d13bad03c9@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "platform/x86: alienware-wmi-wmax: Add G-Mode support to Alienware m16 R1" Message-Id: <174981658790.27029.16646984768467792319.b4-ty@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 15:09:47 +0300 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.13.0 On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 18:30:40 -0300, Kurt Borja wrote: > This reverts commit 5ff79cabb23a2f14d2ed29e9596aec908905a0e6. > > Although the Alienware m16 R1 AMD model supports G-Mode, it actually has > a lower power ceiling than plain "performance" profile, which results in > lower performance. > > > [...] Thank you for your contribution, it has been applied to my local review-ilpo-fixes branch. Note it will show up in the public platform-drivers-x86/review-ilpo-fixes branch only once I've pushed my local branch there, which might take a while. The list of commits applied: [1/1] Revert "platform/x86: alienware-wmi-wmax: Add G-Mode support to Alienware m16 R1" commit: e2468dc700743683e1d1793bbd855e2536fd3de2 -- i.