From: hehuiwen <huiwen.he@linux.dev>
To: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, senozhatsky@chromium.org,
tom@talpey.com, chenxiaosong@chenxiaosong.com, tj@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] ksmbd: send READ payloads with MSG_SPLICE_PAGES
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 23:50:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <174fe1ca-7b5a-466c-b20f-fccbccff6eff@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKYAXd9SW_D1gwMhD8gVjVJAcPoxiXvHB0TvDLqnjw8TpGCKRw@mail.gmail.com>
在 2026/10/24 12:44, Namjae Jeon 写道:
> Order-8 and order-10 allocations can easily fail when memory is
> fragmented. Since MSG_SPLICE_PAGES does not require physically
> contiguous pages, could we allocate individual pages and use a bvec
> iterator instead? Please see drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c as an example.
Yeah, I agree with this. But I tried individual pages with a bvec
iterator. It was about 9% slower than the high-order page version.
Anyway, it still faster than the original copy-based implementation.
Thanks,
Huiwen
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-29 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-22 9:25 [RFC PATCH 0/4] ksmbd: improve WRITE scheduling and TCP READ sends Huiwen He
2026-10-22 9:25 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] workqueue: export attribute and sysfs setup helpers Huiwen He
2026-10-23 19:58 ` Tejun Heo
2026-10-22 9:25 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] ksmbd: route WRITE requests to an unbound workqueue Huiwen He
2026-10-24 4:26 ` Namjae Jeon
2026-10-29 11:52 ` hehuiwen
2026-10-22 9:25 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] ksmbd: complete TCP frames before reporting send success Huiwen He
2026-10-22 9:25 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] ksmbd: send READ payloads with MSG_SPLICE_PAGES Huiwen He
2026-10-24 4:44 ` Namjae Jeon
2026-10-29 15:50 ` hehuiwen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=174fe1ca-7b5a-466c-b20f-fccbccff6eff@linux.dev \
--to=huiwen.he@linux.dev \
--cc=chenxiaosong@chenxiaosong.com \
--cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®