From: "Michal Vokáč" <michal.vokac@ysoft.com>
To: "Lothar Waßmann" <LW@KARO-electronics.de>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@majess.pl>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: pwm: imx: Allow switching PWM output between PWM and GPIO
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 09:01:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <175003bc-eae7-1b30-ebfe-b56ffc58705e@ysoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180822081436.13d8f55b@ipc1.ka-ro>
On 22.8.2018 08:14, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> Michal Vokáč <michal.vokac@ysoft.com> wrote:
>
>> Output of the PWM block of i.MX SoCs is always zero volts when the block
>> is disabled. This can caue issues when inverted PWM polarity is needed.
>> With inverted polarity a duty cycle = 0% corresponds to solid high level
>> on the output. If the PWM is dissabled its output instantly goes to solid
>> zero which corresponds to duty cycle = 100%.
>>
>> To have a trully inverted PWM output configure the PWM pad as a GPIO
>> with pull-up. Then switch the pad to PWM output whenever non-zero
>> duty cycle is needed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Vokáč <michal.vokac@ysoft.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt
>> index c61bdf8..3b1bc4c 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/imx-pwm.txt
>> @@ -14,6 +14,12 @@ See the clock consumer binding,
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/clock-bindings.txt
>> - interrupts: The interrupt for the pwm controller
>>
>> +Optional properties:
>> +- pinctrl: For i.MX27 and newer SoCs. Add extra pinctrl to configure the PWM
>> + pin to gpio function. It allows control over the pin output level when the
>> + PWM block is disabled. This is meant to be used if inverted polarity of the
>> + PWM signal is required. See "Inverted PWM output" section bellow.
>> +
>> Example:
>>
>> pwm1: pwm@53fb4000 {
>> @@ -25,3 +31,41 @@ pwm1: pwm@53fb4000 {
>> clock-names = "ipg", "per";
>> interrupts = <61>;
>> };
>> +
>> +Inverted PWM output
>> +-------------------
>> +
>> +The i.MX SoC has such limitation that whenever a pad is configured as a PWM
>> +output, the output level is always zero volts when the PWM block is disabled.
>> +The zero output level is actively driven by the output stage of the PWM block
>> +and can not be overridden by pull-up. It also does not matter what PWM polarity
>> +a PWM client (e.g. backlight) requested.
>> +
>> +To gain control of the PWM output level in disabled state two pinctrl states
>> +can be used. The "default" state and the "pwm" state. In the default state the
>>
> The "default" function of a PWM is to deliver a PWM signal. So it is
> more sensible to me to have the PWM function as "default" and a "gpio"
> function as alternative state.
Yes, I totally agree that using "default" for PWM and "gpio" as the
alternative function seems more sensible. That is actually how I started.
Then I realized that that way you end up with the PWM pad set to zero
until the first call of imx_pwm_apply_v2 where you can select the GPIO
function. On my system that first call is made by pwm-backlight more than
3s after pinctrl init.
I suggested to use the "default" state as a GPIO function as the only way
how to get a truly inverted PWM output all the time from power-up to
power-down.
In my opinion it is up to the DT author what pad configuration he uses for
each pinctrl function as he knows what the HW really needs. I see that this
approach is kind of controversial but I hope that with good documentation
this would not be a problem. And as I wrote in the intro, it is absolutely
optional. If you do not need it, you do not use it.
>> +PWM output is configured as a GPIO with pull-up. In the "pwm" state the output
>> +is configured as a PWM output. This setup assures that the PWM output is at
>> +the required level that corresponds to duty cycle = 0 when PWM is disabled.
>> +E.g. at boot.
>> +
>> +Example:
>> +
>> +&pwm1 {
>> + pinctrl-names = "default", "pwm";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_backlight_gpio>;
>> + pinctrl-1 = <&pinctrl_backlight_pwm>;
>> +}
>> +
>> +pinctrl_backlight_gpio: pwm1grp-gpio {
>> + fsl,pins = <
>> + /* GPIO with 22kOhm pull-up */
>> + MX6QDL_PAD_GPIO_9__GPIO1_IO09 0xF008
>> + >;
>> +};
>> +
>> +pinctrl_backlight_pwm: pwm1grp-pwm {
>> + fsl,pins = <
>> + /* PWM output */
>> + MX6QDL_PAD_GPIO_9__PWM1_OUT 0x8
>> + >;
>> +};
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-22 7:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-21 14:38 [RFC PATCH 0/2] pwm: imx: Configure output to GPIO in disabled state Michal Vokáč
2018-08-21 14:38 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: pwm: imx: Allow switching PWM output between PWM and GPIO Michal Vokáč
2018-08-22 6:14 ` Lothar Waßmann
2018-08-22 7:01 ` Michal Vokáč [this message]
2018-08-22 11:17 ` Lothar Waßmann
2018-08-22 13:20 ` Michal Vokáč
2018-08-22 14:10 ` Lothar Waßmann
2018-08-23 9:13 ` Michal Vokáč
2018-08-23 11:18 ` Lothar Waßmann
2018-08-23 12:38 ` Michal Vokáč
2018-08-23 10:40 ` Lukasz Majewski
2018-08-23 11:19 ` Lothar Waßmann
2018-08-23 11:21 ` Michal Vokáč
2018-08-23 12:36 ` Lukasz Majewski
2018-10-09 11:03 ` Vokáč Michal
2018-08-31 12:18 ` Rob Herring
2018-08-31 12:45 ` Lothar Waßmann
2018-08-31 13:17 ` Michal Vokáč
2018-08-31 13:30 ` Lothar Waßmann
2018-10-09 10:30 ` Vokáč Michal
2018-08-21 14:38 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] pmw: imx: Configure output to GPIO in disabled state Michal Vokáč
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=175003bc-eae7-1b30-ebfe-b56ffc58705e@ysoft.com \
--to=michal.vokac@ysoft.com \
--cc=LW@KARO-electronics.de \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=fabio.estevam@nxp.com \
--cc=l.majewski@majess.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®