mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: W_Armin@gmx.de, mario.limonciello@amd.com,
	 Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>,
	Pratap Nirujogi <pratap.nirujogi@amd.com>
Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  benjamin.chan@amd.com,
	bin.du@amd.com, gjorgji.rosikopulos@amd.com,  king.li@amd.com,
	Dominic.Antony@amd.com, Phil.Jawich@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: Update swnode graph for amd isp4
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 12:19:44 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <175127518473.2486.7831984908188662697.b4-ty@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250618202958.3934822-1-pratap.nirujogi@amd.com>

On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 16:29:48 -0400, Pratap Nirujogi wrote:

> Existing swnode graph format is specific to sensor device
> and is causing conflicts when accessing standard property
> variables outside the sensor driver.
> 
> To address this issue, enhanced swnode graph format with
> dedicated nodes for i2c and isp devices, with sensor node
> added as child to i2c node. This approach allows to have
> standard property variables (ex: 'clock-frequency') with
> values applicable for each of the devices (sensor, i2c and
> isp).
> 
> [...]


Thank you for your contribution, it has been applied to my local
review-ilpo-fixes branch. Note it will show up in the public
platform-drivers-x86/review-ilpo-fixes branch only once I've pushed my
local branch there, which might take a while.

The list of commits applied:
[1/1] platform/x86: Update swnode graph for amd isp4
      commit: e1af6f0146d64fc4fb142504ba128a97cd171558

--
 i.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-30  9:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-18 20:29 Pratap Nirujogi
2025-06-20  3:06 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-06-20 18:33   ` Nirujogi, Pratap
2025-06-30  9:19 ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2025-06-30 15:34   ` Nirujogi, Pratap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=175127518473.2486.7831984908188662697.b4-ty@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Dominic.Antony@amd.com \
    --cc=Phil.Jawich@amd.com \
    --cc=W_Armin@gmx.de \
    --cc=benjamin.chan@amd.com \
    --cc=bin.du@amd.com \
    --cc=gjorgji.rosikopulos@amd.com \
    --cc=hansg@kernel.org \
    --cc=king.li@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pratap.nirujogi@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®