From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7F66280CC1; Tue, 1 Jul 2025 17:55:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751392516; cv=none; b=WyWRzgMdQ6Xt3FL1T4bVnlpBold8KE0o/cc/ZSSRDXiG0bnxdB3q7useIcvpB5Q5OjTFEsGdWzLT/gZXckeTVIJQHwCap3TQmwEoAeBz7Nr9ijxMFHzxl9XtmrvuynovXsU0ybHMmw1EUDIQoDoDve1sLdXrrlGBr+zjl+eJlpg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751392516; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DnPVouCLiwfGHggG02cDxfN2bxIrdB/EVyqkVKPRB+M=; h=From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Message-Id:Date: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=pR8JQJql14KGGN2I/Ct60XNBffG6h0Z6xKw7N98KhpDEJf78AIJxCxn0U4RMltv5ZiTRjqVjCrcMtvDjWSMECT4S9gTfD2aV4WjO8rXqMZsnO57d8c+qNLK2+dbItyv4m286VMGJgavJa3fiAfBlOGpM5hh+d1N38HpUK3a0n1o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=YVJ5FbyK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="YVJ5FbyK" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 346F7C4CEF1; Tue, 1 Jul 2025 17:55:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1751392515; bh=DnPVouCLiwfGHggG02cDxfN2bxIrdB/EVyqkVKPRB+M=; h=From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date:From; b=YVJ5FbyKZE000KuscpadMEKa962HfDQLUlNdhng1qEiVo3jmwUTJCuxXT3olryiuI wltKayxh9YCtGa6CsD1dytqXGYlmfPTZpCEGr5ZrUtdMIAOYExNZxCLFWKhqFblBr2 tQrkunFkj6IHx74ULaf0w++kaa9vtkFK6/ZAZ19bcukKTYQ7D1QFpD65ADk8qz/pxb lk1T6IHhCAJ1cX+oJ3AOCIWHuutU6Ku6lrXcfJjJmCzBlNHJO5dL0q1KqNP+fGFdDS p9MxsgH5qdJiG9ddpGzknIWmSgqKsTtjxGXfCKjQwldjonH8P/efgoFV/jAY9laJWU kZ3VnyTZ9n/Yw== From: Namhyung Kim To: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Adrian Hunter , Kan Liang , James Clark , Thomas Richter , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ian Rogers In-Reply-To: <20250628015832.1271229-1-irogers@google.com> References: <20250628015832.1271229-1-irogers@google.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf test annotate: Use --percent-limit rather than head to reduce output Message-Id: <175139251517.738306.4966360457421812263.b4-ty@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2025 10:55:15 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.15-dev-c04d2 On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 18:58:32 -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > The annotate test was sped up by Thomas Richter > in commit > 658a8805cb60 ("perf test: Speed up test case 70 annotate basic tests") > by reducing the annotate output using head. This causes flakes on > hybrid machines where the first event dumped may not have the samples > for the test within it. Rather than reduce the output using `head` > switch to `--percent-limit 10` which will stop annotate dumping > functions that have an overhead of less than 10%, the noploop program > should be using more. > > [...] Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks! Best regards, Namhyung