From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDF182F50A3; Wed, 2 Jul 2025 16:43:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751474584; cv=none; b=jueNA1u+BqzwCmom/v4FrZQxrGArjbJu5R6PbyvJmIbJsdt4f7MwqkW7pHs9iQh78Y3XRZQon1qxthyiUDPWoJq973m+zLZIWyFKfW7JsLAsg5WQkQ8DAENo/kcLpIzrCYwg6Qz+vaj/Lz3iYXvrPZmBIwS9ebM3QBgtv8/noss= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751474584; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BPj2I1nKYgeebYPBzlMghOFMPdWzb+1ukzy1T9+iUbI=; h=From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Message-Id:Date: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ngMM5cxngbDanzZPksSw2sP2Rwni9Ho3AX/iYiG7m9JVWWISW6mfhPkmfWPC305yzEyn5QnDVp3WnNRbjkW+RwCgzk1FqujtR8tmwokxmdBu69v7MaT90t+ZvKQA59Fqkru+o4CdBtJH6DaLfuEHc0bM57M3usiQuSNr1Yd+4EQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=V1cEQnwH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="V1cEQnwH" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1A44DC4CEE7; Wed, 2 Jul 2025 16:43:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1751474583; bh=BPj2I1nKYgeebYPBzlMghOFMPdWzb+1ukzy1T9+iUbI=; h=From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date:From; b=V1cEQnwH0eQWpzv1bQI6WeoOI8+d5AsBq+d+kbLFJoCZQccNNvLCzb9kI6hh1wKkl dwQXa7Dt9KZhZ7PgbDiM0yobsxveVEnCG7rgDxVfg5Gy/vl/hjPXXsYev/R/m2XWoY nxPlmzwwFTy3czGCr9hgvM3telOgKl2/j7EkQNvgasTtiN+eZzoi4P4LM3nHnts4H6 xi5hzmkhAr6mVDXXMeByPaeFdAjyeaFMMArXbDIivpHraB4mpn09rx3psMdsAVbQb7 k7cx3g01+Bn8rzAMCwBNNfrolUA8tc4/yzOhvdUpbr/PW72wgH9+jTuvD1LnBj58cT u2CNdmfzkPaJA== From: Namhyung Kim To: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Adrian Hunter , Kan Liang , James Clark , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Ian Rogers In-Reply-To: <20250628012302.1242532-1-irogers@google.com> References: <20250628012302.1242532-1-irogers@google.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] perf test workload noploop: Name the noploop process Message-Id: <175147458305.1845320.7375334735356810228.b4-ty@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2025 09:43:03 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.15-dev-c04d2 On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 18:23:01 -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > Name the noploop process "perf-noploop" so that tests can easily check > for its existence. > > Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks! Best regards, Namhyung