From: "tip-bot2 for Arnd Bergmann" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: locking/core] locking/lockdep: Avoid struct return in lock_stats()
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2025 17:40:11 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <175294681199.1420.7085850697376354418.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250610092941.2642847-1-arnd@kernel.org>
The following commit has been merged into the locking/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: d7c36d6350b5a4b27256eaeeea3b72621a819c9a
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/d7c36d6350b5a4b27256eaeeea3b72621a819c9a
Author: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
AuthorDate: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 11:29:21 +02:00
Committer: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
CommitterDate: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 21:57:20 -07:00
locking/lockdep: Avoid struct return in lock_stats()
Returning a large structure from the lock_stats() function causes clang
to have multiple copies of it on the stack and copy between them, which
can end up exceeding the frame size warning limit:
kernel/locking/lockdep.c:300:25: error: stack frame size (1464) exceeds limit (1280) in 'lock_stats' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than]
300 | struct lock_class_stats lock_stats(struct lock_class *class)
Change the calling conventions to directly operate on the caller's copy,
which apparently is what gcc does already.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250610092941.2642847-1-arnd@kernel.org
---
include/linux/lockdep_types.h | 2 +-
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 27 ++++++++++++---------------
kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep_types.h b/include/linux/lockdep_types.h
index 9f361d3..eae115a 100644
--- a/include/linux/lockdep_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/lockdep_types.h
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ struct lock_class_stats {
unsigned long bounces[nr_bounce_types];
};
-struct lock_class_stats lock_stats(struct lock_class *class);
+void lock_stats(struct lock_class *class, struct lock_class_stats *stats);
void clear_lock_stats(struct lock_class *class);
#endif
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index dd2bbf7..0c94141 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -297,33 +297,30 @@ static inline void lock_time_add(struct lock_time *src, struct lock_time *dst)
dst->nr += src->nr;
}
-struct lock_class_stats lock_stats(struct lock_class *class)
+void lock_stats(struct lock_class *class, struct lock_class_stats *stats)
{
- struct lock_class_stats stats;
int cpu, i;
- memset(&stats, 0, sizeof(struct lock_class_stats));
+ memset(stats, 0, sizeof(struct lock_class_stats));
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
struct lock_class_stats *pcs =
&per_cpu(cpu_lock_stats, cpu)[class - lock_classes];
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(stats.contention_point); i++)
- stats.contention_point[i] += pcs->contention_point[i];
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(stats->contention_point); i++)
+ stats->contention_point[i] += pcs->contention_point[i];
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(stats.contending_point); i++)
- stats.contending_point[i] += pcs->contending_point[i];
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(stats->contending_point); i++)
+ stats->contending_point[i] += pcs->contending_point[i];
- lock_time_add(&pcs->read_waittime, &stats.read_waittime);
- lock_time_add(&pcs->write_waittime, &stats.write_waittime);
+ lock_time_add(&pcs->read_waittime, &stats->read_waittime);
+ lock_time_add(&pcs->write_waittime, &stats->write_waittime);
- lock_time_add(&pcs->read_holdtime, &stats.read_holdtime);
- lock_time_add(&pcs->write_holdtime, &stats.write_holdtime);
+ lock_time_add(&pcs->read_holdtime, &stats->read_holdtime);
+ lock_time_add(&pcs->write_holdtime, &stats->write_holdtime);
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(stats.bounces); i++)
- stats.bounces[i] += pcs->bounces[i];
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(stats->bounces); i++)
+ stats->bounces[i] += pcs->bounces[i];
}
-
- return stats;
}
void clear_lock_stats(struct lock_class *class)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
index b52c07c..1916db9 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
@@ -657,7 +657,7 @@ static int lock_stat_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
if (!test_bit(idx, lock_classes_in_use))
continue;
iter->class = class;
- iter->stats = lock_stats(class);
+ lock_stats(class, &iter->stats);
iter++;
}
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-19 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-10 9:29 [PATCH] lockdep: avoid " Arnd Bergmann
2025-06-18 5:17 ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-18 17:51 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-06-18 17:59 ` Boqun Feng
2025-07-19 17:40 ` tip-bot2 for Arnd Bergmann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=175294681199.1420.7085850697376354418.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
--to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®