From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pg1-f201.google.com (mail-pg1-f201.google.com [209.85.215.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9ECB31A5B92 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 00:27:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.215.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757982478; cv=none; b=ugbXSqzZb3a05iC6ItuBE9+3j0xFT3QZAzNydsyMfK+/lnHvH7Dt1XKz01uzHP3IOxQ95AnqRhpbvayvwCf/YdBY4hKT9aLagcDv152QgpvocszeVR3dc5XdWhJw9VU52GSnWCqukOSH+pqknVAAOlJ3afjHv3vC75bFDLAPkQA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757982478; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PzUM3Cfsli7E9k7NP7Lepm6+OszCbs2678LuFeoy1AE=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Content-Type; b=mXNh72FIfns5FCidjlewzRJZWSjLWvcQoeBlmHnYmIc4TFwPoyNw1j/hazjK8JZ/5EOLPrguMd69KhkMXNJ8bcH0WGafCWcwQWodGny7jhAJBdvbKdKOUxO3y5xKsW0iwlDPlpJpRJPXXtQ2UdoOCWOfKd/7PsRvJycTXmPmdlU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=LWMtOmsm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.215.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="LWMtOmsm" Received: by mail-pg1-f201.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-b54df707c1cso90612a12.2 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2025 17:27:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1757982476; x=1758587276; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:date :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=baDObaahxYUAyV7C9udP7HlsTUog1DJ+CNfR158Eu7k=; b=LWMtOmsm0W1XqTiTYbK5snJ0wy1zhAjgPww41YxQvEj2waZKWDDmYdOl4w9LghCw6j 9PUXSVwFXH5I7KYjIFJmqh4kEs2lFdP15iiqwPmkMp7d/E2ALhsPqL5Lp7Fjc7OQlG+A 7rBTvH9zW5olaN3hi5/1MW/8TyWJw7XQX1vAlqfZ0qzNCDgDL1Bgxh6HoH9QCRR4LZPN qYMpkyFv8q1Rm9vjHc1UshaiNfpTgmhnxXfb3VGpwNYLUrlT3nJfH01cfYgOUga9vPqe 5Cdk38qELjbBjz/N5BEG0UF/Wf+DtOPpymEGHXjaZEgB5rTRlxp973QwKgPlUp2zhIA9 MH4w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1757982476; x=1758587276; h=to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=baDObaahxYUAyV7C9udP7HlsTUog1DJ+CNfR158Eu7k=; b=RaZNlt9HEkzA2gQhTmZoImtdVWvLQHgC+dXU31zvrKE1lj6kJtWI8SJB0v/TD3VhB4 lgrJ7srN+MJpV1AG6AqQsqx1yDLX8kjpFFnYiM8yK2lv9B0il8wMwBrvmAiQ4NL8r2qD fGCYqVWCAs4yqtDpThSMWoR4z1YrHs+EsXJvErRMxD3+6R8dl9vbhUBgndOTMI9QSiaq tI72XP6noe+YFJ3NaOY/eaH95T7VuxaNtPbqaUuOapF0O9BK3qYI7GjKAJ5W7m7MshTS 7gA83mfShJyitEZZ76bUPq3v9CLAUZikCNxQi7t5XEMfGEDkTPsn/wMb36v+mJzkuHa7 V6yg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWRFi0g3S6uzFraLJkCR+zRjwHvKszXB95HBiRC9yKIgNX1uNNorpEZ+HBJFme+53WeXxfZ0hgyU0u8TWM=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxwK6Nwk3Dylvg6BZLLaoCMxOcW1b4OPUv2pjmXipvb6Sza2xpB mmZhjmhr9KcpfjJwS9G5SUFKJpDU3vDzeVXaP2DS33bk5jjeXOceQa2cxldJOeJFkfNWiO6cnuo DmefSBg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGB7LEdNHh9ns9vVvTdWH2C6Q76XFb2XcrJauMeliLMD0z0q/tWVuKSzCyaknAjl1QtXFxCe/nWT/Q= X-Received: from pjg16.prod.google.com ([2002:a17:90b:3f50:b0:32e:5d96:8a6f]) (user=seanjc job=prod-delivery.src-stubby-dispatcher) by 2002:a05:6a20:9187:b0:262:23dd:2ed0 with SMTP id adf61e73a8af0-26223dd328amr12071862637.31.1757982475753; Mon, 15 Sep 2025 17:27:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 17:25:39 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20250901131604.646415-1-liaoyuanhong@vivo.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20250901131604.646415-1-liaoyuanhong@vivo.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.51.0.384.g4c02a37b29-goog Message-ID: <175798207153.624508.1085968130364515751.b4-ty@google.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: hyper-v: Use guard() instead of mutex_lock() to simplify code From: Sean Christopherson To: Sean Christopherson , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Paolo Bonzini , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Liao Yuanhong Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On Mon, 01 Sep 2025 21:16:04 +0800, Liao Yuanhong wrote: > Using guard(mutex) instead of mutex_lock/mutex_unlock pair. Simplifies the > error handling to just return in case of error. No need for the > 'out_unlock' label anymore so remove it. Applied to kvm-x86 misc, thanks! [1/1] KVM: x86: hyper-v: Use guard() instead of mutex_lock() to simplify code https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/864384e97981 -- https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/tree/next