From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5818CEEDE; Sun, 21 Sep 2025 16:33:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758472389; cv=none; b=IcLmTzIc0wLAOAt4XuOU1TCv4WANwJkVyarMFLrWzJMAn0PiCrlpEGoeS9f7b2uR5kXFYi7GIK3d0BkuZxsZ9WuGvFzn22jULGmclFez92Ib/CrwWVA9aseU/fO3hDYU/AyhAwF2WJiRsyJRspDk98YQ4mjjo1oI2/f2V7X7zDM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758472389; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5Cg2M5mdBA51WLv72+0nMAPShXd7ntb3KGFkfyKWP7w=; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc: To:Date:Message-ID; b=ViwXAseZHnTuBR6H5jiTl18QyMTvmNqafD0bbL2/UcVVXyEfLUDEm2CPe4tsZMv6t49NCdcL53u2pSRyylssyOW/NNs4IQPI0bOj4CAjcTVqntn6QRtulEttCjuxP/ZmKQCjzswhvy5MZnk27g47tKeoYKawquth4/XB/g0fvEU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=q0qPF/YA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="q0qPF/YA" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 17712C4CEE7; Sun, 21 Sep 2025 16:33:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1758472389; bh=5Cg2M5mdBA51WLv72+0nMAPShXd7ntb3KGFkfyKWP7w=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:From; b=q0qPF/YA7f02hqqMlRsC4NpyGBZzmjmEmqfaHItxf4QLx09JqCYD+7TKx6jcgislr raDDQZhdtYgHEuADuCpqPPryWiIvZ3Sad++9rp+vh4sVarfAHVKkpC+9Keb+C4OSxn xfJhnAyBEezvkXjc4+xvPbNKK5cnoOL45sob+91JWJf8m8moLlxvuzlEm3hmT1urxE QwcTqyYj4SKww53v2oclEq7HA6bpk+Lde1PMW5Y51NoZjG4jXHZR41jZEcKPWKpQ/J ucOBJVC0tQUHs+PTWTiUx+fXWXYYA9BmPhy/AO+AbVYZF8fpzfkM7W9Ue8wPRoj/7w zDp8lm76RCTsA== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20250825150932.3695931-1-wenst@chromium.org> References: <20250825150932.3695931-1-wenst@chromium.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] clk: mediatek: clk-mux: Do not pass flags to clk_mux_determine_rate_flags() From: Stephen Boyd Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , Chen-Yu Tsai , Matthias Brugger Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2025 09:33:07 -0700 Message-ID: <175847238786.4354.6043816943509142899@lazor> User-Agent: alot/0.11 Quoting Chen-Yu Tsai (2025-08-25 08:09:31) > The `flags` in |struct mtk_mux| are core clk flags, not mux clk flags. > Passing one to the other is wrong. >=20 > Since there aren't any actual users adding CLK_MUX_* flags, just drop it > for now. >=20 > Fixes: b05ea3314390 ("clk: mediatek: clk-mux: Add .determine_rate() callb= ack") > Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai > --- Applied to clk-next