From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Jianpeng Chang <jianpeng.chang.cn@windriver.com>
Cc: claudiu.manoil@nxp.com, vladimir.oltean@nxp.com,
wei.fang@nxp.com, xiaoning.wang@nxp.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, alexandru.marginean@nxp.com,
imx@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v4 PATCH net] net: enetc: fix the deadlock of enetc_mdio_lock
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 23:30:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <176074380701.2822953.14692637268674439157.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251015021427.180757-1-jianpeng.chang.cn@windriver.com>
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Wed, 15 Oct 2025 10:14:27 +0800 you wrote:
> After applying the workaround for err050089, the LS1028A platform
> experiences RCU stalls on RT kernel. This issue is caused by the
> recursive acquisition of the read lock enetc_mdio_lock. Here list some
> of the call stacks identified under the enetc_poll path that may lead to
> a deadlock:
>
> enetc_poll
> -> enetc_lock_mdio
> -> enetc_clean_rx_ring OR napi_complete_done
> -> napi_gro_receive
> -> enetc_start_xmit
> -> enetc_lock_mdio
> -> enetc_map_tx_buffs
> -> enetc_unlock_mdio
> -> enetc_unlock_mdio
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [v4,net] net: enetc: fix the deadlock of enetc_mdio_lock
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/50bd33f6b392
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-17 23:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-15 2:14 Jianpeng Chang
2025-10-16 8:28 ` Wei Fang
2025-10-17 23:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=176074380701.2822953.14692637268674439157.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandru.marginean@nxp.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jianpeng.chang.cn@windriver.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
--cc=wei.fang@nxp.com \
--cc=xiaoning.wang@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome