From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E78902FAC09; Mon, 27 Oct 2025 11:36:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761565013; cv=none; b=p36SvGjrZ8AjQzOcS5A0xT0YP0Ko81QwlxfJPIhAlx6u6pAlyO8km7YK+u0mwNRxjKzOC7jfJNS4cbzldTxYcNHj8m9iH650rBhl62l+eFUKHJQIOZVH2Sr4F5HTqo0n3EpkWDAd4YD3zwKbr3gv0VX+AhSOAoKAvtqRC/ZbWhg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761565013; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GR9p7sJmgdRpfFp4lXDp4Qj9+w0WDpc9bzpGxSfqLzY=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Message-Id:Date: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=oFQ6aGHxZ3Cn5u5EQfLe5VZbY/AUJXuWMW2xCDow+ojpkIkxbNsYrJnR1RlH0J3cnTZA2f0cePWU1CaWV9j867DsBuYeAmSL9Un6EsVMvEmurrTNVgaj2bP8WQwaQCNFv6eALGefwCFye/zyk+RD4iuox0kcRAoR+SkGp0rZcDc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=hfnQoZN+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="hfnQoZN+" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E5F0C4AF0B; Mon, 27 Oct 2025 11:36:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1761565012; bh=GR9p7sJmgdRpfFp4lXDp4Qj9+w0WDpc9bzpGxSfqLzY=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date:From; b=hfnQoZN+LhQnCdYNuGEpTU1gxBjch34hFrWZzO+aRAOXouvkfBb4eKmjIqrMKzig2 KkKGdzI4gM3ZZ34X04hxc4qo/l++QZ1F2syos3jrU9k4nE8uNwy+VPp1AvdDU8S/jn s1y7k0iFuJbzoNI8QqnaH2Nl/Ecl01ogDz3hFxwCt5Y4UUpdH8rcsx9KyCrg2Ld8cc KxSCYiq+N5jc5VbXijX2w433ed3JMn1CRnFzIKbbAmzH1Tn/ZquOJ9HxAAVSztS+k6 6QowQ4BOATczGIJgSbQPypAhyJVkt6kXF1Vfta5zjPwXEtZAmm83lbGgaYC9rwl0gV gwFzU1oM4j4Gw== From: Leon Romanovsky To: Jason Gunthorpe , Sean Hefty , Vlad Dumitrescu , Or Har-Toov , Jacob Moroni , Manjunath Patil , =?utf-8?q?H=C3=A5kon_Bugge?= Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20251021132738.4179604-1-haakon.bugge@oracle.com> References: <20251021132738.4179604-1-haakon.bugge@oracle.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next] RDMA/cm: Base cm_id destruction timeout on CMA values Message-Id: <176156500963.450375.15935808694605364471.b4-ty@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 07:36:49 -0400 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: b4 0.15-dev On Tue, 21 Oct 2025 15:27:33 +0200, HÃ¥kon Bugge wrote: > When a GSI MAD packet is sent on the QP, it will potentially be > retried CMA_MAX_CM_RETRIES times with a timeout value of: > > 4.096usec * 2 ^ CMA_CM_RESPONSE_TIMEOUT > > The above equates to ~64 seconds using the default CMA values. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] RDMA/cm: Base cm_id destruction timeout on CMA values https://git.kernel.org/rdma/rdma/c/58aca1f3de059c Best regards, -- Leon Romanovsky