From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7488827462; Fri, 7 Nov 2025 08:45:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762505130; cv=none; b=B3ZNs/A4UKoDb4xgq125ELLYj55nh3Sy/XFuKVl09318fUtwvzymMXH1GYMy+ChOibrnUrowHWRo24BhXwSGMDIdW33/qzdd6GDpiAMxNwQC65P6fhfOkYaotkQFqS9wHbWeLw7PzujRpYdcwuJngX50byCz9ngRguTlMQHET4s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762505130; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ENvjq7F3dQB96OZQww5CqJrGO1JxGUPY5vCkPTonfPQ=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Message-Id:Date: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ScAZPCzxDqmJZSqc/1WUH8EG2sI5S459gO5hbV7WwfET7fp6cFu47Dj63c4Ryg7Cf8YvuXoCuv+DjNMZopUIM8njGCTpZ7Svx1v4D/u+XLxBf4K1sAhJpAEJHlyLtVmHSLGpxm6mfgQGQpF63ZzmnGAFUBXNCij+ZtwGGvsyzpU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=BSiWgOMC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="BSiWgOMC" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6261DC116B1; Fri, 7 Nov 2025 08:45:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1762505130; bh=ENvjq7F3dQB96OZQww5CqJrGO1JxGUPY5vCkPTonfPQ=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date:From; b=BSiWgOMChA/kpu7XYaGEsSG2hqwsHmvA96u2bTDNkLgvVlFSv07CwN4lcu1qBBT6z BN4xwIwTD2QRQ9fu+PtrsxqApQiSu7IADK3c1NZruXbEWKowKfL0bh9hhC8oB4xOLa oVfAU4PscYY32rVkoLzz61t+WFxLXoUV5nWaGPgIGD7PCa7XvUojdQbvotayqbQMKn c/CQHwxZV5GyQWSaKhl32+0ymagBEaoFu+DnkNztCcGRlx3HIGL6e7T+EgGCvyxtUi wPy3hIUE33la9uZu2qqHa3NDedE+mbzbaHvCdfws+SgZTVR7GWo0OKknpKwWkZ05ED LOarYIskKPQBQ== From: Niklas Cassel To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Marco Crivellari Cc: Tejun Heo , Lai Jiangshan , Frederic Weisbecker , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Michal Hocko , Damien Le Moal In-Reply-To: <20251106160813.314932-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com> References: <20251106160813.314932-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: libata-sff: add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users Message-Id: <176250512811.632228.18184423075799177449.b4-ty@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2025 09:45:28 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.14.2 On Thu, 06 Nov 2025 17:08:13 +0100, Marco Crivellari wrote: > Currently if a user enqueue a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the > used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use > WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to > schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use > again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND. > This lack of consistency cannot be addressed without refactoring the API. > > [...] Applied to libata/linux.git (for-6.19), thanks! [1/1] ata: libata-sff: add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users https://git.kernel.org/libata/linux/c/13f4d995 Kind regards, Niklas