From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F216E25783C; Sun, 9 Nov 2025 11:31:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762687875; cv=none; b=rJZ7jTYyatowPkBLy1X/PbyzUNxKcPVlsWC19le5SfNuELPbIXDAP41BIXzrl8xwPUskK/ozmhNrf8HR3EBd+vzZRTlSB5YcU7YkhHKGqUBZ8iEnhIN1b9mwYP4eyBSi/YQiktmIAeIMeU0ei5SD1FPHU75xzQKwq3aw5/NjwGM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762687875; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/t3nhGBWYJVmx1eyss4OPjWCLjTiWfrwx5H43pyQETI=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Message-Id:Date: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=oL/q1SmJ+eSl1qAV3LrTMFdys9mehvpJ64/e3s4jIpraYp3nU/gR9FdEeeVDU54D6j99Xv6zE09lRER4rztn0rn7q/n9FefLCOYOAXdsWXjIzz7ha6395k+KUDNsKW87nh7FnXtqnJCic9ORZICB1wd/GSXRBZ9ayERVqaBv6sU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=deJxUp6l; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="deJxUp6l" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F1207C4CEFB; Sun, 9 Nov 2025 11:31:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1762687874; bh=/t3nhGBWYJVmx1eyss4OPjWCLjTiWfrwx5H43pyQETI=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date:From; b=deJxUp6lTQ2WwxVf0GEeFChiuZAaH0c2uu3jCGdJOK5TT6qWNTd1iRuJGazMSckwq oYJFCleQq5BYhimDDXab8s+CEVNjBCxOwOwrO2T9AdC9QsN7XxtbdpFOn2kQHI1dq8 XsNmI/wsSyhFuQE6HAklFuGj3xkntwcd5lEJXaPs5nE8BDyq++WleJBFtAegeRIbz8 5YtcvYfWch25dQ31L4DygpzJFOlTPTSTwjBewpo0ABd3z09y049JeyhTtsxLR0MSrO rPZUx425XUZiegvoHelCI5+WJj5ZDokTtVkhqF0+wk3bn710dnATCsSNAGYcCMQxkn HqRXabWw8pSaA== From: Leon Romanovsky To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Marco Crivellari Cc: Tejun Heo , Lai Jiangshan , Frederic Weisbecker , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Michal Hocko , Sagi Grimberg , Max Gurtovoy , Jason Gunthorpe In-Reply-To: <20251107133306.187939-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com> References: <20251107133306.187939-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/iser: add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users Message-Id: <176268787124.581844.15968812562799652549.b4-ty@kernel.org> Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2025 06:31:11 -0500 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.15-dev-3ae27 On Fri, 07 Nov 2025 14:33:06 +0100, Marco Crivellari wrote: > Currently if a user enqueues a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the > used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use > WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to > schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use > again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND. > This lack of consistency cannot be addressed without refactoring the API. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] IB/iser: add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users https://git.kernel.org/rdma/rdma/c/65d21dee533755 Best regards, -- Leon Romanovsky