From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DF282C21D3; Fri, 14 Nov 2025 18:35:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763145327; cv=none; b=Fm39rA8hI3Xq9Dwq5O/mMCFAOfJh+5vIsjoUIZ8D8oblwAF+FfQ/oSLti2vy8mRejTfH4Gtrt/zxadBavvcTLCnwpf4XcSSncwVYBw5oa0z7WJjmSUxtLkuLWKZx+etBCZDAeFoSjUCDmO2ETl9C7j+xiFH85o7BCpVPXLX8/jQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763145327; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZSzk9hs9x/7uPAy2OYyIor7FVN392iJxedW4H6o7HYQ=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Message-Id:Date: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=gM5TfOyPfCbJF0Pwnpca7tuZr5A7l5XeF0bvuk0rGy0inA9JzpbryArXP3E4UhrfW6Jz8OyAKLMNqTSqJZKQ+CQvHr3STiUNpW9wHPDjfrYkfjXCw7wAt6cuVnJQmnNR/GrADRJOc2S+e3kq6Z8fYT8AqKar1RUM7UUI9xm+Zig= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=TUW6bUjT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="TUW6bUjT" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5FF28C19421; Fri, 14 Nov 2025 18:35:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1763145326; bh=ZSzk9hs9x/7uPAy2OYyIor7FVN392iJxedW4H6o7HYQ=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date:From; b=TUW6bUjTtUzg8GhhAqNNsGVFjTjlFXoeY9FOisEouindBecGIV6OfaCoOKMNzHhMt mM7UwlOa1wpkSrNzBJ+ZCqKvMr3iY1Q771JEEvsSA0Ad4r048Tcl0MEnAEf60z1pmx KE2sDrBjClOn8fWll4XCo2Pun5gls/464jAgV/At5H0gL+8t77edltjmwTbFrjVz+Q WfoLngHBFgd2MNnL4l95rqPwvM3Ri3QSs0seBqIUbqzA8xsKN1ug4vhDnkNIjQQCqQ oJLqJ168P4Lq5jqXU5C1OC6aZRbZV5+idnZjiBbo1mB6t8WpL3t2fZRro1yCxpfuI8 nyBvvowyj+9dg== From: Namhyung Kim To: Peter Zijlstra , Adrian Hunter , Ingo Molnar , Jiri Olsa , Mark Rutland , Ian Rogers , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Alexander Shishkin , Zide Chen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, thomas.falcon@intel.com, dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com, xudong.hao@intel.com In-Reply-To: <20251112164823.80168-1-zide.chen@intel.com> References: <20251112164823.80168-1-zide.chen@intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] perf test: Add a perf event fallback test Message-Id: <176314532528.3522480.1979899143868946845.b4-ty@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 10:35:25 -0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.15-dev-c04d2 On Wed, 12 Nov 2025 08:48:23 -0800, Zide Chen wrote: > This adds test cases to verify the precise ip fallback logic: > > - If the system supports precise ip, for an event given with the maximum > precision level, it should be able to decrease precise_ip to find a > supported level. > - The same fallback behavior should also work in more complex scenarios, > such as event groups or when PEBS is involved > > [...] Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks! Best regards, Namhyung