From: "tip-bot2 for Yipeng Zou" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Yipeng Zou <zouyipeng@huawei.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: timers/urgent] timers: Fix NULL function pointer race in timer_shutdown_sync()
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2025 21:57:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <176384862016.498.10720277913756598678.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251122093942.301559-1-zouyipeng@huawei.com>
The following commit has been merged into the timers/urgent branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 20739af07383e6eb1ec59dcd70b72ebfa9ac362c
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/20739af07383e6eb1ec59dcd70b72ebfa9ac362c
Author: Yipeng Zou <zouyipeng@huawei.com>
AuthorDate: Sat, 22 Nov 2025 09:39:42
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitterDate: Sat, 22 Nov 2025 22:55:26 +01:00
timers: Fix NULL function pointer race in timer_shutdown_sync()
There is a race condition between timer_shutdown_sync() and timer
expiration that can lead to hitting a WARN_ON in expire_timers().
The issue occurs when timer_shutdown_sync() clears the timer function
to NULL while the timer is still running on another CPU. The race
scenario looks like this:
CPU0 CPU1
<SOFTIRQ>
lock_timer_base()
expire_timers()
base->running_timer = timer;
unlock_timer_base()
[call_timer_fn enter]
mod_timer()
...
timer_shutdown_sync()
lock_timer_base()
// For now, will not detach the timer but only clear its function to NULL
if (base->running_timer != timer)
ret = detach_if_pending(timer, base, true);
if (shutdown)
timer->function = NULL;
unlock_timer_base()
[call_timer_fn exit]
lock_timer_base()
base->running_timer = NULL;
unlock_timer_base()
...
// Now timer is pending while its function set to NULL.
// next timer trigger
<SOFTIRQ>
expire_timers()
WARN_ON_ONCE(!fn) // hit
...
lock_timer_base()
// Now timer will detach
if (base->running_timer != timer)
ret = detach_if_pending(timer, base, true);
if (shutdown)
timer->function = NULL;
unlock_timer_base()
The problem is that timer_shutdown_sync() clears the timer function
regardless of whether the timer is currently running. This can leave a
pending timer with a NULL function pointer, which triggers the
WARN_ON_ONCE(!fn) check in expire_timers().
Fix this by only clearing the timer function when actually detaching the
timer. If the timer is running, leave the function pointer intact, which is
safe because the timer will be properly detached when it finishes running.
Fixes: 0cc04e80458a ("timers: Add shutdown mechanism to the internal functions")
Signed-off-by: Yipeng Zou <zouyipeng@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251122093942.301559-1-zouyipeng@huawei.com
---
kernel/time/timer.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
index 553fa46..d5ebb1d 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
@@ -1458,10 +1458,11 @@ static int __try_to_del_timer_sync(struct timer_list *timer, bool shutdown)
base = lock_timer_base(timer, &flags);
- if (base->running_timer != timer)
+ if (base->running_timer != timer) {
ret = detach_if_pending(timer, base, true);
- if (shutdown)
- timer->function = NULL;
+ if (shutdown)
+ timer->function = NULL;
+ }
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&base->lock, flags);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-22 21:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-22 9:39 [PATCH] timers: Fix NULL function pointer race in timer_shutdown_sync Yipeng Zou
2025-11-22 21:57 ` tip-bot2 for Yipeng Zou [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=176384862016.498.10720277913756598678.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
--to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=zouyipeng@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®