From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 124BE34252E; Wed, 26 Nov 2025 20:05:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764187523; cv=none; b=bnFatfB1mPORC5rR8Ov5nTve5yfcyMTzrD17DXvKo7kDtVjovT6Q7z2CFhUoPv8D8wfN23MQGbK8fUgMj7BswIxPe2J1v49QcgQCl3P4KGjAms9d6sBq6i8uyhvgexiQ3d+ieFSRnmC+mmqhDaoGRj/7smnaBUdyO/zm3l6ogjs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764187523; c=relaxed/simple; bh=mCA3PyJ/6+FEyx8OrOOSRCeGxDoAzMZQFmgnixE0bxQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Fukw6jTMH+W7sTHmcxYZAHsyldWH868RPAmAoQw8uy3anLv/zfPpeVPYWIWuDZbz7gw+cNmlz+O4u4FymhBMTHiTaFFKC3BaZCoDHO9Oen/KO/zdifWjqWcL7zi5dPJSePs8Y20q931Wfq0OEBbpU5azywDZLYOaARyKByUem1A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=H3/yAfMF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="H3/yAfMF" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 60404C116D0; Wed, 26 Nov 2025 20:05:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1764187522; bh=mCA3PyJ/6+FEyx8OrOOSRCeGxDoAzMZQFmgnixE0bxQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=H3/yAfMFY9Bb6QoZlMM7IXBFGASN0eoqfmKizDomTbvZaHGMOmQtUKKUe5WwLL9Wl a3O6wrkoVL51mGtBkiyPDC52tSK67BFEJ5O6zBzTUMC44GofjvRyQAserkmeFbv8ad APLGpKHq6dnHVe2V2UAvUsFb5DAZPRChbKxNf4xs5tazLr2QDCymgsoGmdQ9nl9A9p mydyhbTNMzL+yHAygo59k7QUsyfu4I5AJVClfl4CY2WzHMeWrVPQIRu/VZnKaN1fF6 vbn2Mm4SQbwe3zOrbASloCnKXTz1yXvKV/vTQYf+aaIE62cLfM/8XdqDaWWYGrid3/ r2/omq/f/RDdA== From: Bjorn Andersson To: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Sakari Ailus Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH 00/80] treewide: Remove redundant pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() calls Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 14:10:44 -0600 Message-ID: <176418784431.1591314.15273685348396747534.b4-ty@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.51.0 In-Reply-To: <20250704075225.3212486-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> References: <20250704075225.3212486-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Fri, 04 Jul 2025 10:52:25 +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote: > Late last year I posted a set to switch to __pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() > and gradually get rid of explicit pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() calls in > drivers, embedding them in the appropriate pm_runtime_*autosuspend*() > calls. The overall feedback I got at the time was that this is an > unnecessary intermediate step, and removing the > pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() calls can be done after adding them to the > relevant Runtime PM autosuspend related functions. The latter part has > been done and is present in Rafael's tree at the moment, also see > : > > [...] Applied, thanks! [58/80] remoteproc: omap: Remove redundant pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() calls commit: 7f07a5c3e2f5f50f354dab622c1b9cc46ee89f67 Best regards, -- Bjorn Andersson