From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1DDD3054DE; Fri, 28 Nov 2025 10:25:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764325548; cv=none; b=ptBJcQVd1uf+GkFQ3MFqN4BE9Wvr/zeW8/nuHSoX2bpXJbTFzAosfYg2HIdg8nwD+R6y0Qc93rGENsZ/4vAPBJB1LivEZUJQKUNcdeg6ttIC/jefh5XwqwmeiSTelvxEm+7CNjkvaRf4CXKb6mZ+lIoYvRo+mBOagDBUzVTpUnE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764325548; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LJh4UeY/c0J50iP/w13Q/lM3sXEI7UEkN16wXFCNc7Q=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Message-Id:Date: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=SwkuDMwYNHEo31eG9hK/MzMJkPltfVR0SxgUJ5j7CN+MfKd06hEVJRNNbrH4Wji13xrEoa0FpqctDOdW5guiZpZuMYogYsg47kEMJLVRdi23l83AKAutGCw54GUoafEihtpjBzarlojFHumPlN2+qSZqqrUt4CkuRuis+Wgfm7Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=FZixFaIJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="FZixFaIJ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1764325547; x=1795861547; h=from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:message-id: date:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LJh4UeY/c0J50iP/w13Q/lM3sXEI7UEkN16wXFCNc7Q=; b=FZixFaIJut+v/Ybm8alR2WkZ0QIYHYGQNhWPPQQUpQ8k5O5AI5wkIgSS cPlWfyDenrk+iH5p9tEoKlcWecaP1Z/cDwxj55MPf5+HwcdhfZR0cfvi0 AiWBQmTWTMpfxdFGNlVoTNzl+2c9/rDqkJp941tjdWjxcySjXXk8Cibxb yFi6EeaTt+fv1bmz57U7d5zr5blkoiSbosYCQPflFNJafdcmEroIL5tUF fzWf+A20czqSl3nwupkt4E7m6pXL5LUg3L2cFgplHePzBC1nKZbnMcQ+s MbMyzv+3i4jrApXX4qt1s9AfpuXr7l0OMU8a2YumSu45k3WOtYQ2dcrMb g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: rEJnUgHQQuusAtE1V3CPOA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: rDhWuf66T7er69MgLKcniQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11626"; a="76991362" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.20,232,1758610800"; d="scan'208";a="76991362" Received: from fmviesa005.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.145]) by fmvoesa105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Nov 2025 02:25:46 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: XLMK5tJyROeynGPD49rzYQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Bdofaxc8SlyOp0pUzFdTFg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.20,232,1758610800"; d="scan'208";a="197762329" Received: from ijarvine-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.229]) by fmviesa005-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Nov 2025 02:25:43 -0800 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ilpo=20J=C3=A4rvinen?= To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, Marco Crivellari Cc: Tejun Heo , Lai Jiangshan , Frederic Weisbecker , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Michal Hocko , Maximilian Luz , Hans de Goede In-Reply-To: <20251127144125.233728-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com> References: <20251127144125.233728-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] replace uses of system_wq with system_percpu_wq, request alloc_workqueue to be per-cpu Message-Id: <176432553810.7427.15425497321285301181.b4-ty@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2025 12:25:38 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.13.0 On Thu, 27 Nov 2025 15:41:22 +0100, Marco Crivellari wrote: > This continues the effort to refactor workqueue APIs, which began with > the introduction of new workqueues and a new alloc_workqueue flag in: > > commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq") > commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag") > > More information can be found at the link below: > > [...] Thank you for your contribution, it has been applied to my local review-ilpo-next branch. Note it will show up in the public platform-drivers-x86/review-ilpo-next branch only once I've pushed my local branch there, which might take a while. The list of commits applied: [1/3] platform/surface: acpi-notify: add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users commit: f03dd5dd736d6aea94406a273be2a10f84bc60e1 [2/3] platform: x86: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq commit: db4399501c58ad1225105224e7c9f03bc3d4fe39 [3/3] platform: surface: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq commit: f720239ca39d72657e1bbf9c4c6270c78f548e43 -- i.