From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751914AbWICCaa (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Sep 2006 22:30:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751915AbWICCaa (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Sep 2006 22:30:30 -0400 Received: from mxsf21.cluster1.charter.net ([209.225.28.221]:55715 "EHLO mxsf21.cluster1.charter.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751914AbWICCaa (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Sep 2006 22:30:30 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.08,203,1154923200"; d="scan'208"; a="827234412:sNHT20419064" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17658.15935.903687.325991@smtp.charter.net> Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 22:30:23 -0400 From: "John Stoffel" To: Andrew Morton Cc: "John Stoffel" , kernel list Subject: Re: 2.6.18-rc5-mm1, make oldconfig from 2.6.18-rc5 destroys LVM In-Reply-To: <20060902184054.5db9fe00.akpm@osdl.org> References: <17658.9856.132429.196116@smtp.charter.net> <20060902184054.5db9fe00.akpm@osdl.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.4.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Morton writes: >> And I'd really suggest that it NOT be this silly name BLOCK, something >> more meaningful, like USE_BLOCK_DEVICES or something equally useful to >> parse. Andrew> mm... I think CONFIG_BLOCK is a reasonable compromise between Andrew> the needs for brevity and understandability. Well, maybe the hotfix patch converts all the uses of 'if BLOCK' to 'if CONFIG_BLOCK', but I still think that 'if USE_BLOCK_DEVS' would be more clear. It's not like it should be all *that* used outside of config stuff. Oh well, thanks for your reply, now I can test 2.6.18-rc5-mm1 and see if my IRQ problem is really there or not. John -- VGER BF report: U 0.5