From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Marek <jonathan@marek.ca>
Cc: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] spi-geni-qcom: remove manual CS control
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 22:59:29 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <176580716950.161463.18012619677965135620.b4-ty@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251120211204.24078-1-jonathan@marek.ca>
On Thu, 20 Nov 2025 16:11:58 -0500, Jonathan Marek wrote:
> The GPI_DMA mode already uses automatic CS control, to use automatic CS
> control for non-GPI case all that's needed is to set the FRAGMENTATION flag
> using the same logic as setup_gsi_xfer(). (note clearing SPI_TRANS_CFG's
> CS_TOGGLE bit enables automatic CS control, the comment was wrong)
>
> spi_geni_set_cs() is slow, so this is a big performance improvement.
>
> [...]
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/5] spi-geni-qcom: remove manual CS control
commit: b99181cdf9fa0247dda3ba1228b4578286ab7ecd
[2/5] spi-geni-qcom: don't set max clock in setup_fifo_params
commit: 7ba2e0edb18b3ccee7339315be47080832a3c355
[3/5] spi-geni-qcom: use xfer->bits_per_word for can_dma()
commit: fb2bbe3838728f572485706677590e4fc41eec5c
[4/5] spi-geni-qcom: initialize mode related registers to 0
commit: 739062a9f1e9a77a9687c8fd30f8e5dd12ec70be
[5/5] spi-geni-qcom: rework setup_fifo_params
commit: 781c3e71c94c80e1b33a7d84b970907dd32abc10
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-15 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-20 21:11 Jonathan Marek
2025-11-20 21:11 ` [PATCH 2/5] spi-geni-qcom: don't set max clock in setup_fifo_params Jonathan Marek
2025-11-20 21:12 ` [PATCH 3/5] spi-geni-qcom: use xfer->bits_per_word for can_dma() Jonathan Marek
2025-11-20 21:12 ` [PATCH 4/5] spi-geni-qcom: initialize mode related registers to 0 Jonathan Marek
2025-11-20 21:12 ` [PATCH 5/5] spi-geni-qcom: rework setup_fifo_params Jonathan Marek
2025-12-15 13:59 ` Mark Brown [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=176580716950.161463.18012619677965135620.b4-ty@kernel.org \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=jonathan@marek.ca \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®