From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2FE618A6A7; Tue, 23 Dec 2025 18:17:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766513870; cv=none; b=GzSUxPvFkuFXBXYkhXY05OuS5/RafFXAzQv+50B61oFBKyvjHva1FMzg/griyCpYEeYYt/Wok/fmEWGDiVOWiW/RLSfFXZtdEL2uIdclKnTbGMHoCJW8DZGuI+KENYtpwSs0ZmrycS1+VfO4vhJRnQG+tWeuRbEy701/jnDpglI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766513870; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MUm97H7mJSYQN5B31+H1xf1fp6sieW8EkBVcfmWx8ns=; h=From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Message-Id:Date: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=mBHsk7VsONYoyUptxdsTmXJ2woMz97oxwl1vNYW2N94eUP9tNsQGqDcDLyi+c4MbjxibYtxxyWDEorS881tspvQLs0BR/s75GLt6T4hG08JYWxkjPRzNvvEf5jTV/voxu+WlJs/aQuUPP2mH8DTC3/xprersVS7ZnD4hjr6Kegk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=KFAvXKWt; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="KFAvXKWt" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A492C19421; Tue, 23 Dec 2025 18:17:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1766513869; bh=MUm97H7mJSYQN5B31+H1xf1fp6sieW8EkBVcfmWx8ns=; h=From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date:From; b=KFAvXKWtdoel9lhv3fjgg4zbwRG76a0o7xECsdmVwLxDoyoHc4JL7T2/e+NYghntq K9YpEu5lQajbIo/7x9aY1xpUPGYdKlnCVZAynGRK/VuF9zhoxi3g2axYdPgFFhhOwC MOOr2tCgKWAL7IZYXvEn6lNVfCE32eIkRV/bBIN2uZtQmSNRsuBa8Q8Gg9MKxrNFkA no8CNfm7d8CYiro9Q0FQKO5R4G7wNdiymOnXgzywhq+6dHJswElG9e3M8A7WiH3pDk I58mAOKV67EJOCq9AJZOqVQLSRCF5hSQCC7lw3DJy5MgyKkk+8c8aVfZKM4vj8o9ZI XGocv+BkW9oDw== From: Namhyung Kim To: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Adrian Hunter , James Clark , Stephen Brennan , Haibo Xu , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ian Rogers In-Reply-To: <20251207022345.909535-1-irogers@google.com> References: <20251207022345.909535-1-irogers@google.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf symbol: Fix ENOENT case for filename__read_build_id Message-Id: <176651386912.34483.44621848769631733.b4-ty@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 10:17:49 -0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.15-dev-c04d2 On Sat, 06 Dec 2025 18:23:45 -0800, Ian Rogers wrote: > Some callers of filename__read_build_id assume the error value must be > -1, fix by making them handle all < 0 values. > > If is_regular_file fails in filename__read_build_id then it could be > the file is missing (ENOENT) and it would be wrong to return > -EWOULDBLOCK in that case. Fix the logic so -EWOULDBLOCK is only > reported if other errors with stat haven't occurred. > > [...] Applied to perf-tools, thanks! Best regards, Namhyung