From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8112C6778A for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 07:56:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ACAA25408 for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 07:56:20 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6ACAA25408 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=nod.at Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933467AbeGBH4T (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jul 2018 03:56:19 -0400 Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at ([195.201.40.130]:43338 "EHLO lithops.sigma-star.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932988AbeGBH4R (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jul 2018 03:56:17 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lithops.sigma-star.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E1D660A04AC; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 09:56:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lithops.sigma-star.at [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id AD2_qy6G_05v; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 09:56:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lithops.sigma-star.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED4760A04A9; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 09:56:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lithops.sigma-star.at [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 3fhyr-REtMcQ; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 09:56:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from blindfold.localnet (unknown [82.150.214.1]) by lithops.sigma-star.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2AF36609332A; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 09:56:15 +0200 (CEST) From: Richard Weinberger To: Boris Brezillon Cc: Artem Bityutskiy , Quentin Schulz , dwmw2@infradead.org, computersforpeace@gmail.com, marek.vasut@gmail.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ubi: provide a way to skip CRC checks Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2018 09:56:14 +0200 Message-ID: <1767453.cfoEQ8yxZA@blindfold> In-Reply-To: <20180702095121.67bc61ef@bbrezillon> References: <1530516625.469.82.camel@gmail.com> <20180702095121.67bc61ef@bbrezillon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Montag, 2. Juli 2018, 09:51:21 CEST schrieb Boris Brezillon: > Hi Artem, > > On Mon, 02 Jul 2018 10:30:25 +0300 > Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, 2018-06-28 at 09:40 +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote: > > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/kapi.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/kapi.c > > > index d4b2e87..e9e9ecb 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/kapi.c > > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/kapi.c > > > @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ struct ubi_volume_desc *ubi_open_volume(int ubi_num, int vol_id, int mode) > > > desc->mode = mode; > > > > > > mutex_lock(&ubi->ckvol_mutex); > > > - if (!vol->checked) { > > > + if (!vol->checked && !vol->skip_check) { > > > /* This is the first open - check the volume */ > > > err = ubi_check_volume(ubi, vol_id); > > > if (err < 0) { > > > > Did you deliberately did not add a similar check to 'vol_cdev_write()' ? > > You want to skip checking on load but do have the checking after volume update ? > > Yep, it's on purpose, I asked Quentin to keep the test on the update > volume path. > > > Looks a bit inconsistent to me. At the very least deserves a comment in > > 'vol_cdev_write()' about why 'skip_check' flag is ignored there. > > Well, I thought checking the CRC just after updating the volume made > sense, just to make sure things were written correctly on the medium. > Let's add a comment explaining why we keep the check here, unless you > see a strong reason to get rid of this check in the update path. +1 I also vote for keeping the check. vol->skip_check is really just "skip the check upon volume open". Thanks, //richard