mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tip-bot2 for Namhyung Kim" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Rosalie Fang <rosaliefang@google.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: perf/core] perf/core: Fix slow perf_event_task_exit() with LBR callstacks
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 21:44:11 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <176851345131.510.5041502314619080345.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260112165157.1919624-1-namhyung@kernel.org>

The following commit has been merged into the perf/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     4960626f956d63dce57f099016c2ecbe637a8229
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/4960626f956d63dce57f099016c2ecbe637a8229
Author:        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
AuthorDate:    Mon, 12 Jan 2026 08:51:57 -08:00
Committer:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CommitterDate: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 10:04:26 +01:00

perf/core: Fix slow perf_event_task_exit() with LBR callstacks

I got a report that a task is stuck in perf_event_exit_task() waiting
for global_ctx_data_rwsem.  On large systems with lots threads, it'd
have performance issues when it grabs the lock to iterate all threads
in the system to allocate the context data.

And it'd block task exit path which is problematic especially under
memory pressure.

  perf_event_open
    perf_event_alloc
      attach_perf_ctx_data
        attach_global_ctx_data
          percpu_down_write (global_ctx_data_rwsem)
            for_each_process_thread
              alloc_task_ctx_data
                                               do_exit
                                                 perf_event_exit_task
                                                   percpu_down_read (global_ctx_data_rwsem)

It should not hold the global_ctx_data_rwsem on the exit path.  Let's
skip allocation for exiting tasks and free the data carefully.

Reported-by: Rosalie Fang <rosaliefang@google.com>
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260112165157.1919624-1-namhyung@kernel.org
---
 kernel/events/core.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 101da5c..da013b9 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -5421,9 +5421,20 @@ attach_task_ctx_data(struct task_struct *task, struct kmem_cache *ctx_cache,
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	for (;;) {
-		if (try_cmpxchg((struct perf_ctx_data **)&task->perf_ctx_data, &old, cd)) {
+		if (try_cmpxchg(&task->perf_ctx_data, &old, cd)) {
 			if (old)
 				perf_free_ctx_data_rcu(old);
+			/*
+			 * Above try_cmpxchg() pairs with try_cmpxchg() from
+			 * detach_task_ctx_data() such that
+			 * if we race with perf_event_exit_task(), we must
+			 * observe PF_EXITING.
+			 */
+			if (task->flags & PF_EXITING) {
+				/* detach_task_ctx_data() may free it already */
+				if (try_cmpxchg(&task->perf_ctx_data, &cd, NULL))
+					perf_free_ctx_data_rcu(cd);
+			}
 			return 0;
 		}
 
@@ -5469,6 +5480,8 @@ again:
 	/* Allocate everything */
 	scoped_guard (rcu) {
 		for_each_process_thread(g, p) {
+			if (p->flags & PF_EXITING)
+				continue;
 			cd = rcu_dereference(p->perf_ctx_data);
 			if (cd && !cd->global) {
 				cd->global = 1;
@@ -14562,8 +14575,11 @@ void perf_event_exit_task(struct task_struct *task)
 
 	/*
 	 * Detach the perf_ctx_data for the system-wide event.
+	 *
+	 * Done without holding global_ctx_data_rwsem; typically
+	 * attach_global_ctx_data() will skip over this task, but otherwise
+	 * attach_task_ctx_data() will observe PF_EXITING.
 	 */
-	guard(percpu_read)(&global_ctx_data_rwsem);
 	detach_task_ctx_data(task);
 }
 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-01-15 21:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-12 16:51 [PATCH] " Namhyung Kim
2026-01-13  0:24 ` kernel test robot
2026-01-13 14:58 ` kernel test robot
2026-01-13 21:21 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-01-15 21:44 ` tip-bot2 for Namhyung Kim [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=176851345131.510.5041502314619080345.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
    --to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rosaliefang@google.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®