From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 577EB3A1A45; Thu, 22 Jan 2026 17:00:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769101200; cv=none; b=XfwioONR9VofqwaYKMwWMUK+ob02Hh2bWWwHuacivFJLbwts3TQpXNbYRZqv3jhSEXQWoWaTKZET5ByKL6WsiCY0BqBe8678GNf0LPfoLb7uTC1GIqz+vQjaFAnAINyE2I8XCS9pQC/qqqDsZyWLhvGPRGXye7a0IVkJ6+Fi/0M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769101200; c=relaxed/simple; bh=XP3btCdfZ18H84BPvTQijTYLXkXA2fMO98F8VgchIOQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=MNgqplam+1Kz+Jzt/jdnPI8zYVgzOylh7UOJJ3jVdA1zKTYydosVsGo2d5sKe965MscEnVxjZgu29ICq/DQ4oBGzrdvRBXs2JCYGtjGSRIKxKh2sQZ1k/JqOTKUq/5nkSPV46aKfolPDceq62bute2RcvkojpEBXfdfnY+FH9Kk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=CzfjNByW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="CzfjNByW" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC8E4C19423; Thu, 22 Jan 2026 16:59:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1769101199; bh=XP3btCdfZ18H84BPvTQijTYLXkXA2fMO98F8VgchIOQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=CzfjNByWkqZNWarc97P1of6ulVVMxbVA/TgAr1EUL/UA3sAWJZXfm5ATHgrcGhh4C o3RD7/pgYiOact5D3MlLRiRG+EwE4AObbmeEz85hsP6ChoIwzIsAiNdaHJCS6wmWAh E4Q7hePj2AEHx6XkHkp5ZqxbUCbIhBXgiPSHiOgAmdhkMRan4A20Y8J1MT5ov81XZF rpzwHOL4sckepaVDxw08M1PCWrs6jdhWdo6UbcvVDztaGl0KmYwEHEHeWocqXpzUPI KPr776MBBB+QfF2nHn/vZc/gKekFtUz4PlFtJ5TvaACtw9Xjm72wQqH0qcYqJ5moYa 6P8FN8iETPbiw== From: Will Deacon To: Lifeng Zheng , Beata Michalska , Catalin Marinas , Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: kernel-team@android.com, Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: topology: Do not warn on missing AMU in cpuhp_topology_online() Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 16:59:41 +0000 Message-ID: <176908072212.2053791.7954554866629671060.b4-ty@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 09:51:45 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > When CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK is not enabled, and resuming from s2ram on > Renesas R-Car H3 (big.LITTLE 4x Cortex-A57 + 4x Cortex-A53), during > enabling of the first little core, a warning message is printed: > > AMU: CPU[4] doesn't support AMU counters > > This confuses users, as during boot amu_fie_setup() does not print such > a message, unless debugging is enabled (freq_counters_valid() prints > "CPU%d: counters are not supported.\n" at debug level in that case). > > [...] Applied to arm64 (for-next/cpufreq), thanks! [1/1] arm64: topology: Do not warn on missing AMU in cpuhp_topology_online() https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/747d5b6735ca Cheers, -- Will https://fixes.arm64.dev https://next.arm64.dev https://will.arm64.dev