From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 11:21:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 11:21:12 -0500 Received: from franka.aracnet.com ([216.99.193.44]:5836 "EHLO franka.aracnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 11:21:12 -0500 Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 08:27:28 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Adrian Bunk cc: linux-kernel , lse-tech Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance Message-ID: <177230000.1044376046@[10.10.2.4]> In-Reply-To: <173250000.1044373915@[10.10.2.4]> References: <200302040656.h146uJs10531@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> <162450000.1044342810@[10.10.2.4]> <20030204122536.GV6915@fs.tum.de> <173250000.1044373915@[10.10.2.4]> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>> Comparing Intel's compiler vs GCC on Linux would be more interesting. >>> Anyone got a copy and some time to burn? >> >> There are already people who have done this, e.g. >> >> http://www.coyotegulch.com/reviews/intel_comp/intel_gcc_bench2.html >> >> compares g++ and Intel's C++ compiler with C++ code. > > C would be infinitely more interesting ;-) Speaking of which, has anyone ever compiled the ia32 Linux kernel with the Intel compiler? I thought I saw some patches floating around to make it compile the ia64 kernel .... that'd be an interesting test case ... might give us some ideas about what could be tweaked in GCC (or code rejiggled in the kernel). M.