From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C01E3D34B2; Mon, 9 Mar 2026 14:58:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773068282; cv=none; b=pK1Mrk19fCP/kTs79EmFNec0naR3eNNnjC8+cap1Hw+P341i1UvVcG1Oi7dFpU81QKWwgwT6igG+4R4vfmD5Lcrus1S5Bx7BaS46La27cuUdnopphQOEwGo5KECTKnh1IyvJfRpumJlZe2rw7hE4Kw3MwmJ3HATYMAlBhMu7Tog= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773068282; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5uYgTlPiCB0q9enqvVxpMUngCgO7OsOWuacB8SSrPtE=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Message-Id:Date: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=b17udkbdWXlxEOzLqN44S208HG/uWHI0F5Ixm4YfCfdyTeNZIlvYyS4KcK2ZxZ9wa1j0ugoa6j8nGsKTEWxKCRfdMXE+CowWF9FpYO3QjZiAfWVpXdGap7HbFZsjQyzQmj26bKHyaSaJg5Atbg1kqsjHMWnGJkwoyDNUMP4tyUs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Pp4wlmdb; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Pp4wlmdb" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1773068282; x=1804604282; h=from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:message-id: date:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5uYgTlPiCB0q9enqvVxpMUngCgO7OsOWuacB8SSrPtE=; b=Pp4wlmdbV5pgNJ8SyypDziXwQqKS7fktT8TXuriEla0J4BZ42b3rnkDb 5bBz1KGup1uugFJGpc8ReAqubHXmoQm8aNDUT5nan8c4tIESuJbO0dBQs NidBQxtVRI50QWYNd3pj8J9GzDVym2tThahzA0LARcIzIpH09TnqQDmZ3 Q2FB1Rkpi7CyRNtMVDcbzBSnxnUvi0EuXa/O9SJH/OQ2Bc61gbXaXo8Gf R1P1aQ1HcDP4jl/A06PJzyq3rGBWY/FiUdLacJ5lrGQyyyP9J8hp/2V8a VX8CiROC2NlkjLiOqUdVq+2+apjnrtaiiGS0vZnXA74KSdOcDfbVnoD7I Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: lleJphyYS1q9iydsPrF8jw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: D1kX1n1TQnK4MDPruy6G0A== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11723"; a="77697590" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,109,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="77697590" Received: from orviesa001.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.141]) by orvoesa107.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Mar 2026 07:58:01 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: HtXkRgL1R6KR7DsPGDfRnQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: fUzVACVRS8ewjUwlXMizFA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,109,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="257698433" Received: from ijarvine-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.153]) by smtpauth.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Mar 2026 07:57:57 -0700 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ilpo=20J=C3=A4rvinen?= To: Hans de Goede , Coby McKinney Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh , Mark Pearson , "Derek J. Clark" , ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260202205214.18898-1-coby@bytemap.space> References: <20260202205214.18898-1-coby@bytemap.space> Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: use seq_puts() instead of seq_printf() Message-Id: <177306827324.16654.14999952040167346547.b4-ty@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2026 16:57:53 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.13.0 On Mon, 02 Feb 2026 12:52:11 -0800, Coby McKinney wrote: > checkpatch.pl reported warnings where seq_printf() was used for simple > strings with no format specifiers. > > Replace these instances with seq_puts() to avoid the overhead of runtime > string parsing and to conform to kernel coding standards. > > > [...] Thank you for your contribution, it has been applied to my local review-ilpo-next branch. Note it will show up in the public platform-drivers-x86/review-ilpo-next branch only once I've pushed my local branch there, which might take a while. The list of commits applied: [1/1] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: use seq_puts() instead of seq_printf() commit: c2948247cd1a6f3e476df46a1bd903c79f3228dd -- i.