From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDE35390C8B; Mon, 23 Mar 2026 10:47:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774262835; cv=none; b=iPbqEvw4jqdbLtSqGpn0riB6Wrbup4hxUBpcvckt65gBJvKYOy1ZQ33iw6DBuczaVpV7s7neXS12667qKT+sLl6I7Tinq2h/Rded8IK/KJvi7A4Mi7f2mPigiQ1JPx0HJX9DvaRazDMDQ9XIkDyXRDpQAN2ojrtEanxNlmH1fMA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774262835; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0NUK8VRmQ4Cp9kanzBWCjpNq1JsmARXiiQF5DxHJG3s=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Message-Id:Date: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=m/6FUuNcLaXqQi6OhZ4bR7Y3+IVALgPQebiqAAVJkz76FTnd7iQK74wvmtz9pdnoVAV75fMvTq9F4xgyaKVgRSAePjO7ux89JJd/FDHhjAgQ26iYV3zKghZE5VFNTJqS1BW6AOpvXrtY3bjeQr0VT0CH/5AZu1XIHFoUQ8b0LFE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=WdTV8Pu0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="WdTV8Pu0" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1774262834; x=1805798834; h=from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:message-id: date:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0NUK8VRmQ4Cp9kanzBWCjpNq1JsmARXiiQF5DxHJG3s=; b=WdTV8Pu0Qh71go/2du5fFn/cwIYr/0zdxi42luZg/7KS6qy9N0/33XUS Ay3+V9EpdfKmMBpOtyZcmRw64NfbuVqjOjbF3/dxvi5FhTWrCPe0c47ep UljBMCNeTX0dsxWEpLLZM4cXELNxEExdIZrHT2NWECXgSyCba3KV1bxYp JFeS1Pr02OJwJ40/YNvhsOItuNrK3Awzqhhsu6Ba22XGin0OSWN+rfZ43 EcJjCIu345nmSLroRahagkL9eTEiVThc3qCcl4BKczRH2jKffj2kCgUEa vZrO/bNssxLnKHpk7lQpDOfqmkGOoG6xmTSeSWjOgYdRaA4Ia7IT+qTAh Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: jSFxS+PPTWugN1XWijh1lw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 01Sxq0mIRPGQZrZt2b35aA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11737"; a="85952795" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,137,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="85952795" Received: from orviesa007.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.147]) by fmvoesa103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Mar 2026 03:47:14 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: YwYpkmxMTB+9arGjCnRqEg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: R0kEfuntT5mDG5AEER5Nlg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,137,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="224203600" Received: from ijarvine-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.49]) by orviesa007-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Mar 2026 03:47:08 -0700 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ilpo=20J=C3=A4rvinen?= To: Santosh Kumar Yadav , Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Peter Korsgaard , Hans de Goede , Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260318-barco-p50-gpio-set-v2-0-c0a4a6416163@gmail.com> References: <20260318-barco-p50-gpio-set-v2-0-c0a4a6416163@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] barco-p50-gpio: normalize return value of "get" and convert to guard() Message-Id: <177426282270.8512.4556036830475075786.b4-ty@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 12:47:02 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.13.0 On Wed, 18 Mar 2026 19:56:16 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > These 2 patches fixes a regression in the driver arising from gpiolib > tightening its API, and converts it to guard() notation when taking a > mutex to simplify the code flow. > > v2: > > - added reviiewed-by and fixes trailers > - added new patch using guard() > > [...] Thank you for your contribution, it has been applied to my local review-ilpo-next branch. Note it will show up in the public platform-drivers-x86/review-ilpo-next branch only once I've pushed my local branch there, which might take a while. The list of commits applied: [1/2] platform/x86: barco-p50-gpio: normalize return value of gpio_get commit: 1c9d30d37aaffe3454d70b89a77f8aaecda257bf [2/2] platform/x86: barco-p50-gpio: convert to guard() notation commit: a5877e921389178f994a5ec15a145d7e7ba3ec65 -- i.