From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755973AbbBDXHJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2015 18:07:09 -0500 Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:53552 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1755909AbbBDXHG (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2015 18:07:06 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com Cc: Paul McKenney , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-next , LKML , Stephen Rothwell , Kristen Carlson Accardi Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4 Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 00:30:01 +0100 Message-ID: <1777022.KaV9ILjeny@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.16.0-rc5+; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <20150204193535.58f132c5@canb.auug.org.au> <1511573.AlfExlvQsO@vostro.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, February 04, 2015 11:46:32 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:54 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Wednesday, February 04, 2015 09:18:03 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> > Hi all, > >> > > >> > The next release I will be making will be next-20150209 - which will > >> > probably be after the v3.19 release. > >> > > >> > Changes since 20150203: > >> > > >> > The sound-asoc tree gained a conflict against the sound tree. > >> > > >> > The scsi tree gained a build failure caused by an interaction with the > >> > driver-core tree. I applied a merge fix patch. > >> > > >> > The akpm-current tree gained a build failure for which I disabled > >> > CONFIG_KASAN. > >> > > >> > Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 7461 > >> > 7314 files changed, 309736 insertions(+), 172363 deletions(-) > >> > > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > > >> > >> [ CC linux-rcu | linux-pm | intel_pstate maintainers ] > > > > Dirk is not the maintainer of intel_pstate any more, CC: Kristen. > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> after suspend-and-resume I see the following call-trace: > > > > Do you see that after CPU1 offline too? > > > > NO. > > After... > > root# echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online > > ...I see this: > > +[ 707.936668] PM: Saving platform NVS memory > +[ 707.936674] Disabling non-boot CPUs ... > +[ 707.936712] intel_pstate CPU 2 exiting > +[ 707.938024] smpboot: CPU 2 didn't die... > +[ 707.949128] intel_pstate CPU 3 exiting > +[ 707.950369] smpboot: CPU 3 didn't die... > +[ 707.966248] ACPI: Low-level resume complete > +[ 707.966302] PM: Restoring platform NVS memory > > Full dmesg attached. The dmesg doesn't match what you said above. Anyway, that's not what I meant. Does the CPU1 offlining alone: # echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online trigger the trace? It should. -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.