From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932151AbWDLK4c (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2006 06:56:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932154AbWDLK4b (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2006 06:56:31 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:63386 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932151AbWDLK4b (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2006 06:56:31 -0400 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20060411150512.5dd6e83d.akpm@osdl.org> References: <20060411150512.5dd6e83d.akpm@osdl.org> <16476.1144773375@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> To: Andrew Morton Cc: David Howells , torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use atomic ops for file_nr accounting, not spinlock+irq X-Mailer: MH-E 7.92+cvs; nmh 1.1; GNU Emacs 22.0.50.4 Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 11:56:17 +0100 Message-ID: <17771.1144839377@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton wrote: > > Make the kernel use atomic operations for files_stat.nr_files accounting > > rather than using a spinlocked and interrupt-disabled critical section. > > This code has all been redone in current kernels. Hmmm... So it has. Trond's tree hasn't caught up yet, which is a bit of a problem:-/ David