From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A71603F9F48; Mon, 11 May 2026 14:22:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778509367; cv=none; b=o6Z2nwRZ+q80USGFGJt2yD4LYLDWvGr23Yyq3hRODeKsST00KtHR/fL3qZySsQfzknxYyo98qc+1/XeoyhIM5upeftlONAFZcBb0mHfyvcIhxGjIYIOV4HeiGmF8kxU6ndRvxdyDWEXzHN4/gluvCnKxfdrY9vYnbCsvmMutv80= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778509367; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5v9GfqkbotNz1ccUL9cYV30Ru9w2m6sQjlIfQiH4SEw=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Message-Id:Date: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=pazqcbIS7bbJ2bYIKKw/dEO6Hq6U+unz2BIqwCxWUHKGYpb7Y2LB7lmavbQqCjBeUG72mDwc23t84+HKgIXvBVh+fYUv6fI3eUZPR22+WC898nqZ0vZ/uOwIUWYVccuYcCzE3vFb564kQvQkHqIaCqd+riDPYYQoXQbrU5yLHyU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=avEaXUWw; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="avEaXUWw" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1778509366; x=1810045366; h=from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:message-id: date:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5v9GfqkbotNz1ccUL9cYV30Ru9w2m6sQjlIfQiH4SEw=; b=avEaXUWw3bVPvzbyoJK41c8TjQpN8UR9YLKp7lopWqRdD4TY9GCjl4ey HFMYiSvs5LhG+GdhCpHWF9ppql+Qmxmbs/RD8qmDjP7WByB464WcCQvv1 B7eg9rNeCEJ1jGo+kXX5tgqfSyQ+1Op/ISQOdMd3P61WtPxm96vDUGhK/ z/9NGquEoNCecSZu0kW/8bqgz263HdqekuXiSvwAvjio72baumgl7fdzv LIDGfs2ciG50r1UCbU/g1/DxG9nyjCKYr7zLtuKwhqJSeUFhO6hivnqq1 TMVZ2O3rxKhzZyvqRdbPy1lewMBi6mYu3WUuX/VP73KKNEp53OGA+Wr1q A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: tRK0JbtXQFKUBN4geSFw1A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: wysAVjHVRBSVErwzLO41RA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11783"; a="102059202" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,229,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="102059202" Received: from orviesa007.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.147]) by orvoesa101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 May 2026 07:22:46 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: dNHUAg1RSgGjl4WvwwwTNA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: CTilTqicQu6ECQ7cZSWOIw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,229,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="237689777" Received: from ijarvine-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.28]) by orviesa007-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 May 2026 07:22:43 -0700 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ilpo=20J=C3=A4rvinen?= To: Hans de Goede , =?utf-8?q?Uwe_Kleine-K=C3=B6nig_=28The_Capable_Hub=29?= Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Markus Schneider-Pargmann In-Reply-To: <20260507155025.3186956-2-u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com> References: <20260507155025.3186956-2-u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: pmc_atom: Use named initializer for pci_device_id array Message-Id: <177850935972.20649.14704316844002988328.b4-ty@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 17:22:39 +0300 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: b4 0.13.0 On Thu, 07 May 2026 17:50:25 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub) wrote: > While being more verbose using a named initializer yields easier to > understand code and doesn't rely on the two hidden zeros in the > PCI_VDEVICE macro. > > This doesn't introduce any changes to the compiled result of the array, > which was confirmed with an ARCH=x86 build. > > [...] Thank you for your contribution, it has been applied to my local review-ilpo-next branch. Note it will show up in the public platform-drivers-x86/review-ilpo-next branch only once I've pushed my local branch there, which might take a while. The list of commits applied: [1/1] platform/x86: pmc_atom: Use named initializer for pci_device_id array commit: 3b95f36464ec161bcf14c5d1e5f9d5d5e9464582 -- i.