From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70C3E34040F for ; Tue, 19 May 2026 15:23:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779204224; cv=none; b=rQ84N8DKXcqoovBnc+Prnde5GRvVVM3+/SgL2biqhq8JMkdMQM+DHo/mL1OlH7EXx0nDBzqKnMQWWU8m9mpixodZnLERO2+lI7K0c45ytbxgeoM5q3hldqYAV5NET977pKt0OurQ2U3lUF+XQVEmie2oA2dRr3FT/TEx0VnBQA4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779204224; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wo/3Jalj0wbPPgCmEC3L3xx//A6I77FAZexucPTvbsE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=JT0AP8tBOagR5vhmlaZpwgB6mEL2NEA0zinUP3UKVQ+qWOcI5hrfezO1qRro2Hgenv8Uj1Lf6DobBueDa5xgHoqLN3Cj4DA7al4He6KBc5ykaPFo1zeJfGbvQ/IT5YU8xdZ7eRd1W3BPQXkI9vvgUbhuA1+2ehiwzSqQG54m98s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=AkZ7ZEs8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="AkZ7ZEs8" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B4179C2BCB3; Tue, 19 May 2026 15:23:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1779204224; bh=wo/3Jalj0wbPPgCmEC3L3xx//A6I77FAZexucPTvbsE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=AkZ7ZEs8Z5er6t/kB84kfHTHVCgvVQVDxn93QHWruNNpgX8QLO18vQG3+/TqfIndk S35OG3Q/bztl2PXQvJa8/lZdDKJaTggDhK4pJxXg31Ej1dPFMqujmRj3BJyqd52S7r Nj1EH1BKsCljJ+BE5u0jaDWFc9ONu7RRhhw5luKcxwQfpKTiCNFwb3mmbKjSqsN7ZR f8NCSkDyyjkPea3IYch+JcmHS6aWw2jsX23N8efBrdRZoUpWPnn6omimDAtdRdY7Vi RsBOhiU0ikDXLVG8lQyDcOaK8R5XS/Pm9b+jNpFDr5WEJTZlxgJNwPPnypYhyPG6kb akuGC5D21RxWg== From: Will Deacon To: Catalin Marinas , Marco Elver Cc: kernel-team@android.com, Will Deacon , Thomas Huth , Nathan Chancellor , Kees Cook , Vlastimil Babka , Harry Yoo , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Implement _THIS_IP_ using inline asm Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 16:22:56 +0100 Message-ID: <177919212155.821738.445805330517950360.b4-ty@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260511201711.3249121-2-elver@google.com> References: <20260511201711.3249121-2-elver@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Mon, 11 May 2026 22:16:59 +0200, Marco Elver wrote: > Both GCC [1] and Clang [2] consider the generic version of _THIS_IP_ to > be broken: > > #define _THIS_IP_ ({ __label__ __here; __here: (unsigned long)&&__here; }) > > In particular, the address of a label is only expected to be used with a > computed goto. > > [...] Applied to arm64 (for-next/misc), thanks! [1/1] arm64: Implement _THIS_IP_ using inline asm https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/d54e4fde9de2 Cheers, -- Will https://fixes.arm64.dev https://next.arm64.dev https://will.arm64.dev