From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 848FD30F957; Tue, 19 May 2026 14:45:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.13 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779201926; cv=none; b=olIBdXId4xZpilyopkcAy7OCcv03hDjSRQlpLdiltUE0a2e30k8mnTIaxJoByhl3b5LjwIgtWvg70Oe30qE4/5a5dSbM54MMrPD5+cb/R5MNnjFQPOJgiJkGOY9FntnJeHxIyOj8V9tSGrGbFdfQo5eOT2nNiUupj2Hq3QOXWwM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779201926; c=relaxed/simple; bh=tZZzYwkvLxK94hqzQAgZusSZ6g+LvtRjmYTXUCN5deI=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Message-Id:Date: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=L0I3dOJVL1If40zbGbPRTBFBv755CIzFCi7GTKCPeJ2HK+s5TwlMUmDlnL7XZkIiHnBjO3pBIu3wiyvHFPyeCdtl5v+pVbZQt7VdnPlFjyH7igD//Ldu9U3IHcbZRmmyaDVdu8BtQ/3zxYRRFNlVbqnY1T9oobVzfkxLTLTJ4uw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=nTLbkXQO; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="nTLbkXQO" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1779201926; x=1810737926; h=from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:message-id: date:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tZZzYwkvLxK94hqzQAgZusSZ6g+LvtRjmYTXUCN5deI=; b=nTLbkXQOKIwSsYs5Mcal6M3Sg7NZfzPKHRo6tY29EoJzZb+CVWTsYGWO zx765Sb8Yq0Zdm+NlveC5EUdnp/NuqeKn7stMr/ei6qom1zlYo6woiXJc nrU2xtVpqDEMKpl55/BXKxGebUXwzdb2a2XgHConU+nfoZC5uggo92s/P WHDu3Aiumrit4auqDYhxR2ptmRb3A9ixzFPkmaPXIGnDHsvEpgS+Waca1 0PLNePebiznZI9Ef0tXCTVp4AiTaPcXSWo1oP8gpEqoliU9PEiXef1bQ9 cTEKbOMxxTLE+0Mkewy8NEX3i52DQH3qW5SGeiij/JUifTQOilRBjk/CN w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: C6MrnBpnST6P0YcyGmGl/A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: MDOv+WHhQT+KawK1lP+JxA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11791"; a="91187523" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,243,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="91187523" Received: from fmviesa009.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.149]) by orvoesa105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 May 2026 07:45:25 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: uUOIXd7mRr2fzd5FIT/88g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: HoUTfsS1TPGzJhckc1Goxw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,243,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="233421181" Received: from ijarvine-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.236]) by fmviesa009-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 May 2026 07:45:21 -0700 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ilpo=20J=C3=A4rvinen?= To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Hans de Goede , LKML , Linux ACPI , Andy Shevchenko , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, Andrea Ho , Eric Piel , Alex Hung , Shravan Sudhakar , AceLan Kao In-Reply-To: <6007701.DvuYhMxLoT@rafael.j.wysocki> References: <6007701.DvuYhMxLoT@rafael.j.wysocki> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] platform/x86: Check ACPI_COMPANION() or ACPI_HANDLE() against NULL Message-Id: <177920191661.22546.17820402763309898151.b4-ty@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 17:45:16 +0300 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.13.0 On Tue, 12 May 2026 17:10:35 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This series replaces > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/4731840.LvFx2qVVIh@rafael.j.wysocki/ > > and as a whole it makes exactly the same code changes. > > Every platform driver can be forced to match a device that doesn't match > its list of device IDs because of device_match_driver_override(), so > platform drivers that rely on the existence of a device's ACPI companion > object need to verify its presence. > > [...] Thank you for your contribution, it has been applied to my local review-ilpo-fixes branch. Note it will show up in the public platform-drivers-x86/review-ilpo-fixes branch only once I've pushed my local branch there, which might take a while. The list of commits applied: [1/5] platform/x86: adv_swbutton: Check ACPI_HANDLE() against NULL commit: e7a9a6ea40e352cd7977f6a8c80bdeadf65ad838 [2/5] platform/x86: hp_accel: Check ACPI_COMPANION() against NULL commit: abfbe5ee8ae89f1f5449790423d5dd3e423545bd [3/5] platform/x86: intel-hid: Check ACPI_HANDLE() against NULL commit: 5c69e090ae5dd93d910f70db0796357080707d26 [4/5] platform/x86: intel_sar: Check ACPI_HANDLE() against NULL commit: 2765f16c12af7c2533763e46b8113b727354012d [5/5] platform/x86: intel-vbtn: Check ACPI_HANDLE() against NULL commit: a9f305c5a355efeb240d406d378491d9eec02d07 -- i.