From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AA6E2EA754; Sun, 24 May 2026 22:38:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779662313; cv=none; b=rQsUp6uKMo5a0NKWj7oNz0+H+BM+OMcX2mvPieCtRdztQjKyFYdkcul/JRPHUl9EDfVjRT/kUw4h/Mp9TBJF+Dh0ic9gZ8wDERM6YgvFn9vSm+FgkWXyMQJt8Q4ugqFuu0NrnnIbYIDucRFebzNIlnMa1jnaLEpO5oh4R6vXjZI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779662313; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xKUYj4yzdB/0o7DIgT/4yNYpy+sKFHch32XuUFbC+AI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=XoQOuPw8x4b7X450iD1NHLfbKbTZAwgpLxuB3e20AOqnsFujFdxe4m1fpxIqI43BaZdJa1S21a8mEdog6MSiaj76RrgqRqfCchsve7cgBT1iv/sTGnFHbVQ1Ak9xRRHV2E8ZfAqY6ip7pfsL1vBXH5k0jVotUvTlkS/H4JZ/qR4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=DhqcqBuT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="DhqcqBuT" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8AC191F000E9; Sun, 24 May 2026 22:38:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1779662312; bh=QPb55gSnDR8xwX9KH2gBT4f2QQLkB8HYg5P/YhSOLLM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=DhqcqBuTLBEMuc4Li00AWqaGX7FG08Ds+3muLlOdLamOoabFkUWkwGhYOGUj3kUy8 XZyT57d0yUL+hDGmqLPbUdrbORBiJd2b3RuiBdHF3xQKCoLdSzehZ9Skx9QCrmMNmT BIcQunsXWUjUeSfaOFpLawv0w3PeM3xZYV7WEd9wknfOvJX12+1abUSP0SVdggjumG aPFZAiPWmV5M6Rgf/OravI6XH7LwWw2As3Za7fQp9DqV34/7K8mTl0HSIA68dT/1Xr M8LsAjLWuV4I1nsBj7zn7BILvLH0kfJQWOpSTbykShhCpahkBGsIFq13LrcNqbN7k/ gzsvYH+XEM3vw== From: Chen-Yu Tsai To: Jernej Skrabec , Samuel Holland , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chen-Yu Tsai , Andrey Skvortsov Subject: Re: [PATCH] bus: sunxi-rsb: Always check register address validity Date: Mon, 25 May 2026 06:38:23 +0800 Message-ID: <177966228131.169428.14889058847784781615.b4-ty@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260301144939.1832806-1-andrej.skvortzov@gmail.com> References: <20260301144939.1832806-1-andrej.skvortzov@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Sun, 01 Mar 2026 17:49:39 +0300, Andrey Skvortsov wrote: > The register address was already validated for read operations in > regmap_sunxi_rsb_reg_read before being truncated to a u8. Write operations > have the same set of possible addresses, and the address is being truncated > from u32 to u8 here as well, so the same check is needed. > > Remerged for 7.2 instead. Applied to sunxi/drivers-for-7.2 in sunxi, thanks! [1/1] bus: sunxi-rsb: Always check register address validity https://git.kernel.org/sunxi/linux/c/61192938a587 Best regards, -- Chen-Yu Tsai