From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934022AbcJMVnZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Oct 2016 17:43:25 -0400 Received: from cloudserver094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:45495 "HELO cloudserver094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1755022AbcJMVnH (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Oct 2016 17:43:07 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: "Luc, Piotr" Cc: "srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "viresh.kumar@linaro.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "lenb@kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Add Knights Mill CPUID Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 23:48:19 +0200 Message-ID: <1780433.ynzyL9V08i@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/4.8.0-rc2+; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1476369859.27971.11.camel@intel.com> References: <20161012182550.2102-1-piotr.luc@intel.com> <1991911.AIWBrncZ9n@vostro.rjw.lan> <1476369859.27971.11.camel@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, October 13, 2016 02:48:28 PM Luc, Piotr wrote: > On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 21:39 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 08:25:50 PM Piotr Luc wrote: > > > > > > --- > > > Depends-on: x86/cpu/intel: Add Knights Mill to Intel family > > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161012180520.30976-1-piotr.luc () intel > > > ! com > > > > First, putting broken URLs into patch tags doesn't really help. > > OK, with a series the link is not needed. I will refer to a patch > inside the series. > > > > > Second, please send all of these patches as a series where the first > > patch makes the change the rest depends on. That would make them > > easier to > > handle. > > > I see. I just wonder if I should send the entire series to all > maintainers that maintain individual modules/files or somehow limit > 'TO' recipients only to their modules. > Is any good method to it correctly? The To: list should be possibly short. I would just send it To: x86@kernel.org and put the other addresses into the CC list. Generally speaking, CCs of the entire series should go to all of the relevant maintainers (so they have a chance to respond to your patches in the context of the series) though. Thanks, Rafael